期刊文献+

社会与情绪健康量表(中学版)中文版修订 被引量:6

Chinese Version of Social and Emotional Health Survey-Secondary
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:引进社会与情绪健康量表-中学版(SEHS-S),对其进行中文修订,检验SEHS-S中文版在我国青少年群体中的信、效度及其跨年级、性别的测量等值性。方法:应用中文版SEHS-S对湖南省六个地区7-12年级3750名中学生施测,三周后抽取其中88名被试进行重测。结果:SEHS-S中文版维度结构与原量表一致,由12个测量指标所构成的4个核心积极特征维度可以有效的聚合到二阶因子综合活力Covitality上,4个维度包括:情绪能力、有活力的生活、对自己的信念、对他人的信念,验证性因素分析结果支持社会与情绪健康综合活力(Covitality)二阶模型:(1)CFI=0.938;(2)SRMR=0.037;(3)RMSEA=0.053;SEHS-S总分与青少年主观幸福感、抑郁、焦虑、压力以及学生自评学业成绩的相关系数分别为:0.459、-0.358、-0.247、-0.223、0.277;总量表的内部一致性系数为0.917;三周后的重测信度为0.891;测量等值性检验结果显示SEHS-S具有跨性别的部分等值性和跨年级的完全等值性。结论:修订后的中文版SEHS-S具有良好的信效度以及跨性别的部分等值及跨年级的完全等值性。 Objective: The Social Emotional Health Survey-Secondary(SEHS-S) was developed to assess adolescent' s core mindsets that are associated with positive development. The present study extended SEHS-S research by examining its use with Chinese adolescents sample(Grades 7-12; N=4100) and examined the invariance of the SEHS-S factor structure for males and females. Methods: 3750 secondary students were measured, 88 of which participated the test-retest 3 weeks later. Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS-PA) and Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (21Item) (DASS-21) were used as the criteria-related validity instrument. Results: Confirmatory factor analy- sis showed that the fitting parameters of the second-order model were satisfactory, the data of CFA were fitted the second- order model of covitality: (1)CFI=0.938; (2)SRMR=0.037; (3)RMSEA=0.053; (4)S-Bx^2=473.168(n=1873), P〈0.001. For the total score of SEHS-S, the correlation coefficients were 0.459 to SWLS, -0.358 to depression, -0.247 to anxiety, -0.223 to stress; The internal consistency coefficient of the total scale was 0.917; the test-retest reliability was 0.891; The multigroap analysis indicated the SEHS-S higher-order model had full measurement invariant across gender and grade groups. Conclusion: The revised Chinese version of SEHS-S has sound reliability and validity, as well as gender and grade equivalence.
作者 谢家树 刘姗 Chunyan Yang Michael J.Furlong XIE Jia-shu;LIU Shan;Chunyan Yang;Michael J. Furlong(Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China;University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第6期1012-1016,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 湖南省哲学社会科学规划基金项目:"青少年欺负受害对其学校适应的影响:基于潜在类别分析研究"(项目编号:16YBA275)
关键词 社会与情绪健康综合活力(Covitality) 中学生 信度 效度、测量等值性 Covitality Measurement Chinese adolescents Social and Emotional Health Survey-Secondary
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1辛自强,池丽萍.快乐感与社会支持的关系[J].心理学报,2001,33(5):442-447. 被引量:270
  • 2邱林,郑雪.主观幸福感的结构及其与人格特质的关系[J].应用心理学,2005,11(4):330-335. 被引量:58
  • 3Lucas Richard E,Diener Ed, Eunkook Suh. Discriminant Validity of Well-Being Measures[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996,71 (3) : 616-628.
  • 4Diener Ed,Suh Eunkook M. Subjective Well-Being :Three Decades of Progress[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1999,125(2):276-302.
  • 5Matt Vassar. A Note on the Score Reliability for the Satisfaction with Life Scale: an RG Study[J]. Social Indictors Research, 2008, 86:47-57.
  • 6Watson D, Clark L A, TeUegen A. Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect : The PANAS Scales [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 54 (6): 1063-1070.
  • 7Campbell A. Subjective measures of well-being[J]. American psychologist, 1976,31 : 117-124.
  • 8Keyes CL. Promoting and protecting mental health as flour- ishing: a complementary strategy for improving national me- ntal health. American Psychologist, 2007, 62(2): 95-108.
  • 9Suldo SM, Shaffer EJ. Looking beyond psychopathology: The dual-factor model of mental health in youth. School Psychol- ogy Review, 2008, 37(1): 52-68.
  • 10Seligman ME, Ernst RM, Gillham J, et al. Positive educa- tion: Positive psychology and classroom interventions. Ox- ford Review of Education, 2009, 35(3): 293-311.

共引文献948

同被引文献31

引证文献6

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部