期刊文献+

左冠状动脉形态与左主干急性心肌梗死发生及住院死亡的关系 被引量:6

Correlation of the left coronary artery morphology and occurrence of acute myocardial infarction with left main lesion and in-hospital mortality
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨左冠状动脉解剖形态与左主干(LM)急性心肌梗死(AMI)发生及住院期间死亡的关系。方法回顾性分析2010年1月至2015年4月于哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院行冠状动脉造影证实左主干病变的176例患者的临床资料及冠状动脉造影资料,根据是否发生AMI分为LM-AMI组(43例)和LM非AMI组(非AMI组,133例),LM-AMI组根据住院期间死亡情况分为存活组(35例)和死亡组(8例)。利用定性比较分析(QCA)软件测量左冠状动脉解剖形态,采用单因素分析及Logistic回归分析,研究左冠状动脉解剖形态与LM-AMI发生及住院期间死亡的关系。结果 LM-AMI组患者左前降支(LAD)与左回旋支(LCX)夹角小于非AMI组(P<0.05),而LM直径及长度、LAD及LCX直径、LM与LAD夹角和LM与LCX夹角两组比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);LAD与LCX夹角较小者LM-AMI的发生率明显增加,且LAD与LCX夹角<79.43°的患者发生LM-AMI的风险是LAD与LCX夹角为79.43°~108.73°患者的3.6倍。LM-AMI存活组与死亡组LM直径及长度、LAD及LCX直径、LM与LAD夹角、LM与LCX夹角及LAD与LCX夹角比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论LM病变患者LAD与LCX夹角与LM-AMI的发生相关,LAD与LCX夹角<79.43°是LM病变患者发生LM-AMI的独立危险因素,而左冠状动脉解剖形态与LM-AMI患者住院期间死亡无相关性。 Objective To discuss the correlation of the left coronary artery morphology and occurrence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with left main lesion and in-hospital mortality. Methods This was a retrospective study of clinical information and angiographic data of 176 patients admitted from January 2010 to April 2015 with left main lesion in the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. The patients were divided into left main acute myocardial infarction group and left main non-acute myocardial infarction group, and then the left main AMI group was further divided into the survival group and the deceased group according to the situation of in-hospital deatE QCA software was used to measure the anatomical morphology of left coronary artery. The anatomical morphology of left coronary artery between the two groups was compared, and univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis were applied to analyze the factors of AMI occurrence and in-hospital mortality in AMI patients with left main lesiorL Results The angle between the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and the left circumflex artery (LCX) of the LM-AMI group was smaller than the non-acute myocardial infarction group (P〈0.05), but there was no significant difference in the diameter and length of left main coronary artery (LM), the diameter of LAD and LCX, the angle between LM and LAD and the angle between LM and LCX between the two groups (/'〉0.05). The risk of LM-AMI in patients with the angle between LAD and LCX of 〈 79.43~is 3.6 times right than patients with the angle between 79A3^- 108.73~. Between the survival group and the deceased group of AMI patients with left main lesion, there were no significant differences in the diameter and length of LM, the diameter of LAD and LCX, the angle between LM and LAD, the angle between LM and LCX and the angle between LAD and LCX (/〉0.05). Conclusions There was a correlation between the angle between LAD and LCX with the occurrence of LM-AMI in patients with left main lesion. The angle between LAD and LCX of 〈 79.43~ is the independent risk factor of LM-AMI in patients with left main lesion, but there was no correlation between the left coronary artery morphology and in-hospital mortality of patients with left main ANti.
出处 《中国介入心脏病学杂志》 2017年第10期561-567,共7页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
基金 哈尔滨高层次人才基金(2013SYYRCYJ06)
关键词 冠状动脉 急性心肌梗死 左主干病变 Coronary artary Acute myocardial infarction Left main coronary artery Lession
作者简介 通信作者:李为民,E—mail:Liweimin_2009@163.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献50

  • 1Yeon Pyo Yoo,Ki-Woon Kang,Hyeon Soo Yoon,Jin Cheol Myung,Yu Jeong Choi,Won Ho Kim,Sang Hyun Park,Kyung Tae Jung,Myung Ho Jeong.One-year clinical outcomes in invasive treatment strategies for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock in eld-erly patients[J].Journal of Geriatric Cardiology,2013,10(3):235-241. 被引量:7
  • 2陈剑峰,林飞鸿,曾坚卫.急性心肌梗死住院病例10年回顾性调查及防治体会[J].广东医学,2004,25(8):974-976. 被引量:7
  • 3周国伟,孙宝贵,温沁竹,张建军,金炜,张国兵,王毅.急性心肌梗死介入治疗后院内死亡原因分析[J].心肺血管病杂志,2005,24(4):214-216. 被引量:4
  • 4于雪,邹彤,何青,孙福诚,季福绥,许锋.老年人左冠状动脉主干病变的临床分析[J].内科急危重症杂志,2006,12(3):115-117. 被引量:3
  • 5Seung KB,Park DW,Kim YH,et al. Stents versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med, 2008,358(17) : 1781-1792.t,2012,27 (1): 1 -2.
  • 6Koliaki C, Sanidas E, Dalianis N, et al. Relationship between established cardiovascular risk factors and specific coronary angio- graphic findings in a large cohort of Greek catheterized patients. Angi- ology,2011,62( 1 ) :74-80.
  • 7Roeters van Lennep JE,Zwinderman AH,Roeters van Lennep HWO, et al. Gender differences in diagnosis and treatment of coronary arterydisease from 1981 to 1997. Eur Heart J,2000,21 (11) ;911-918.
  • 8Leaf DA,Sanmarco ME,Bahl RA. Gender differences in coronary angiographic findings from 1972 through 1981 in Los Angeles, California. Angiology,1990,41 (8) ;609-615.
  • 9Giannoglou GD,Antoniadis AP, Chatzizisis YS,et al. Prevalence of narrowing ^50% of the left main coronary artery among 17,300 patients having coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol, 2006, 98 ( 9 ) : 1202-1205.
  • 10Soleimani A,Abbasi A,Kazzazi EHP,et al. Prevalence of left main coronary artery disease among patients with ischemic heart disease: insights from the Tehran Angiography Registry. Minerva Cardioangiol, 2009,57(2): 175-183.

共引文献125

同被引文献54

引证文献6

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部