期刊文献+

后腹腔镜下肾部分切除术治疗肾肿瘤的疗效及安全性评价 被引量:1

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for kidney neoplasms
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价后腹腔镜下肾部分切除术治疗肾肿瘤的临床效果和安全性。方法选取我院收治的40例肾肿瘤患者随机分为对照组(n=20)与试验组(n=20),对照组采取开放性肾部分切除术治疗,试验组采取后腹腔镜下肾部分切除术治疗,比较两组手术指标及术后并发症发生情况。结果试验组肾动脉阻断时间、术中出血量均显著优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组置管时间、术后肛门排气时间,平均住院时间均明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组术后并发症总发生率为10.00%,稍低于对照组的25.00%,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论采用后腹腔镜下肾部分切除术治疗肾肿瘤具有一定的有效性和安全性,更有利于患者术后康复,值得在临床中进一步推广。 Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy(RLPN) for kidney neoplasms. Methods Forty patients treated in our hospital were randomly divided into control group and experimental group, with 20 cases in each group. The control group was treated with open partial nephrectomy, and the experimental group was treated with RLPN. The operation indexes and postoperative complications were compared in the two groups.Results The renal artery occlusion time and the intraoperative blood loss of the experimental group were better than those of the control gruoup(P<0.05). The intubation time, postoperative anal exaust time and the average stay in the experimental group were better than thoese of the control group(P<0.05). The total incidence rate of postoperative complications in the experimental group was 10.00%, which was slightly higer than 25.00% of the control group, but the difference was not significant(P>0.05). Conclusion RLPN is effective and safe in the treatment of kidney neoplasms, and benefit for postoperative rehabilitation and worthy of further application.
作者 李震
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2017年第29期73-74,共2页 Clinical Research and Practice
关键词 肾肿瘤 后腹腔镜 肾部分切除术 kidney neoplasms retroperitoneal laparoscopy partial nephrectomy
作者简介 作者简介:李震(1970-),男,汉族,陕西西安人,副主任医师,学士.研宄方向:泌尿科肿瘤.
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献94

  • 1孟琼,万崇华,罗家洪.癌症患者生命质量测定量表EORT CQLQ-C30的应用[J].中国行为医学科学,2005,14(3):273-274. 被引量:164
  • 2王文成,马腾骧.312例肾癌诊治现状:肾癌的早期诊断[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1989,10(4):209-212. 被引量:15
  • 3Pantuck A J, Zisman A, Belldegrun AS, et al. The changing natu- ral history of renal cell carcinoma[ J ]. J Urology, 2001,166 (5) : 1611-1623.
  • 4Stafforda HS, Sahzstein SL, Shimasaki S, et al. Racial/ethnic and gender disparities in renal cell carcinoma incidence and survival [J]. J Urology, 2008,179(5) :1704-1708.
  • 5Aron M, Nguyen MM, Stein P,J, eta/. Impact of gender in renal cell carcinoma: an analysis of the SEER database[ J]. European Urology, 2008,54( 1 ) :133-142.
  • 6Hu J, Ugnat AM. Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Re- search Group. Active and passive smoking and risk of renalcellcar- cinoma in Canada[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2005,41 (5) :770-778.
  • 7Parker AS, Cerhan JR, Janney CA, et al. Smoking cessation and renal cell carcinoma [ J ]. Ann Epidemiol, 2003,13 ( 4 ) :245-251.
  • 8Colli JL, Busby JE, Amling CL. Renal cell carcinoma rates com- pared with gealth status and behavior in the United States[ J]. J U- rology, 2009,73 (2) :431-436.
  • 9Hu J, Chen Y, Mao Y, et al. Alcohol drinking and renal cell car- inoma in Canadian men and women [ J ]. Cancer Detect Prey, 2008,32( 1 ) :7-14.
  • 10Mellcmgaard A, McLaughlin JK, Overvad K, et al. Dietary risk factors for renal cell carcinoma in Denmark[ J]. European J Canc- er, 1996,32A(4) :673-682.

共引文献93

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部