摘要
我国《劳动合同法》虽然明确了对用人单位和劳动者双方签订的服务期可以适用违约金条款,但是关于服务期违约金的规定,却存在适用范围过于狭窄,不符合实践的问题。现有规定中的服务期违约金更多体现出损害赔偿金性质,缺乏惩罚性。虽然是本着保护劳动者的宗旨进行了这样的规定,但是从实践效果和理论分析来看,却与立法者的初衷相违背,偏离了对劳动者倾斜保护的轨道。因此,需要更新服务期及其违约金立法理念,对现有服务期具体法律规范进行完善,以满足劳动者的需求,提升劳动者劳动力价值,平衡用人单位和劳动者的权利义务,真正达到保护劳动者的目标。
Although China＇s Labor Contract Law stipulates that liquidated damages can be applied for service period, the applicable scope of liquidated damages provision is too narrow to meet the need of practice. The liquidated damages provision of service period reflects more compensation than punitive damages. Although such a provision is in line with the purpose of protecting the workers, the practice and theoretical analysis show that it is contrary to the original intention of the legislators and deviates from the track of the inclined protection towards workers. In order to meet the demand of workers, improve labor value, keep the balance of rights and obligations between employers and workers and truly achieve the goal of protecting workers finally, we need to update the concept of liquidated damages provision of service period and improve legal norms of the existing service period.
出处
《中国劳动关系学院学报》
2017年第2期48-54,共7页
Journal of China University of Labor Relations
关键词
服务期
违约金
适用范围
法律性质
service period
liquidated damage
applicable scope
legal nature
作者简介
占菲菲（1992-），女，安徽滁州人，华东政法大学经济法律研究院研宄人员，2015级经济法学院经济法硕士，研究方向为经济法、公司法。
