摘要
面对范式转换开启的机会窗口和随之而来的高不确定性,后发者选择何种追赶路径更有可能赶超领先者?为回答这一问题,以新能源汽车发展引发的范式转换为背景,选取了我国市场上典型的汽车企业案例;然后,以比较企业优势观为理论基础,将新、旧范式下的技术和产品以及领先企业和后发企业纳入模型,经过研究辨识出三类追赶路径:渐进式、突进式和混合式。这些路径在实施方式、对企业具有比较企业优势和竞争优势的要求以及影响追赶成败的关键因素等方面均不相同。目前,我国企业实施的主要是渐进式和突进式追赶,然而,混合式追赶路径也应该成为我国企业,特别是大型国企的一个未来选择。
A paradigm shift will open windows of opportunity as well as bring high uncertainty. What catch - up paths should latecomer firms choose to catch up with leading ones in such a situation？ For this question, the paradigm shift driven by new energy vehicles＇ development is taken as the research context, and typical automobile enterprises are selected from Chinese market; and then according to the comparative firm advantage （CFA） view, a theoretical model is built by including technologies and products of new and old para- digm, leading firms and latecomer ones. Based on the analysis three catch - up paths are identified and named phased, plunge, and hybrid respectively. These paths are significantly different in operation ways, requirements to firms＇ CFAs and competitive advantages, and critical factors to catch - up fulfillment. At present, phased and plunge catch - up paths are the favorite alternatives of most Chinese enterprises. However, hybrid catch -up path should also be a future option of Chinese enterprises, especially of the state -owned enterprises.
出处
《科学学研究》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2017年第1期101-109,共9页
Studies in Science of Science
基金
天津市科技发展战略研究计划项目(13ZLZLZF06100)
关键词
后发企业
追赶路径
比较企业优势观
范式转换
latecomer firm
catch - up path
the comparative firm advantage view
paradigm shift
作者简介
邢文凤（1969-），女，辽宁抚顺人，副教授，博士，研究方向为战略管理、技术经济及管理。E—mail：xing_wenfeng@163．com。
