期刊文献+

方法改革与当代教育改革的困局破解 被引量:7

Reforming Methods and Solving the Predicament of Contemporary Educational Reform
原文传递
导出
摘要 启动与推进教育改革,首先需恰切地解决改革方法问题。当代教育并不缺乏改革,改革已成为世界范围内教育发展的主旋律,但众多的改革运动在改革方法上明显缺乏科学性与可行性品质,使教育发展形式上变化较多实质性改变很少。教育改革因为不当的定位及行动,面临着严峻的价值性与功能性失调困惑及失衡性与失败性境遇困扰。当代教育改革须遵循改革与发展特定的专业逻辑;超越化约论的思维方式与行为方式,由单向度要素驱动转向整体性、综合性推进;实现自上而下与自下而上改革的融合。 To start and promote educational reform,proper methods need to be selected. Contemporary education isnot lack of reforms,and reform has become the main theme of educational development all over the world. However,thereare a lot of reforms lacking of scientificity and feasibility of reform methods,which have made educational developmentchange more in form rather than in substance. Improper methods in contemporary educational reform are facing theproblems of maladjustment in value and function,and dilemma of unbalance and failure. The contemporary educationreform must follow the specific professional logic of reform and development;exceed the thinking and behavior pattern ofreductionism,turning from one dimensional factor-driving to integrality and comprehensiveness;realize the integration ofreform of top-down and bottom-up.
作者 郝德永
机构地区 沈阳师范大学
出处 《教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第11期138-143,共6页 Educational Research
基金 国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题"我国教育综合改革的方法论研究"(课题批准号:BHA140088)的研究成果
关键词 教育改革 要素驱动 社会倒逼 行政化 education reform factor-driven being forced by society administerization
作者简介 郝德永,沈阳师范大学副校长、教授,博士
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献34

  • 1Tianlong Yu. In the Name of Morality: Character Education and Political Control[M]. New York: Peter Lang. 2004:55-65.
  • 2Joel Spring. Political Agendas for Education, 4th ed[M]. New York: Routledge. 2010: 107-108.
  • 3Hunter, Children in the Service of Conservatism. 15.
  • 4Hunter,57.
  • 5Delfattore, What Johnny Shouldn't Read, 123.
  • 6Fraser, Unruly Practices, 172-173.
  • 7Basil Bernstein.The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse.
  • 8Apple, Cultural Politics and Education, 22-41.
  • 9Madeleine Arnot. "Schooling for Social Justice," unpublished paper. University of Cambridge, Department of Education. 1990.
  • 10Michael W. Apple, et al. , The State and the Politics of Knowledge (New York.. Routledge, 2003.

共引文献40

同被引文献51

引证文献7

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部