期刊文献+

Growth Performance, Feed Conversion Ratio and Economics of Production of Native and Crossbred (Local x Holstein Friesian) Bulls for Fattening under Different Improved Feeding

Growth Performance, Feed Conversion Ratio and Economics of Production of Native and Crossbred (Local x Holstein Friesian) Bulls for Fattening under Different Improved Feeding
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 An experiment was conducted to evaluate the growth performance and cost per gain of indigenous and crossbred (local x Holstein Friesian (L x HF)) bulls under four different improved feed treatments to determine the appropriate ration for economic organic beef production in Bangladesh. Twenty indigenous bulls (average body weight 208.08 ± 13.98 kg) and 20 crossbred (L x l-IF) bulls (average body weight 256.26 ± 26.85 kg) of 24 months age were divided into four equal groups and fed on four diets (T0, T1, T2 and T3) up to 120 d, where To referred to the conventional diet, and T1, T2 and T3 referred as improved organic diets. Required dry matter for individual animal was supplied by roughage and concentrate sources of the ration in the ratio of 2:1. Local grass and paddy straw were supplied to group T0 and T1, Napier grass and straw to group T2, and Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum), straw and Ipil-ipil leaf (Leuceana leucucephala) to group Ts as roughage; whereas, the concentrate was supplied as 1.5% of live weight. The results revealed that total dry matter intake (DMI), total DMI as percent live weight (%LW), feed conversion ratio (FCR) and average daily gain (ADG) varied significantly (P 〈 0.01) among different treatment groups. Breed also had significant (P 〈 0.01) effect on total DMI, FCR and ADG, but total DMI (%LW) was not affected by breed type. Feed cost expressed as per kg live weight gain (LWG) (BDT/kg LWG; 1USD = 78.95 BDT), were also affected (P 〈 0.01) by feed treatments and breed type. Indigenous and crossbred bulls fed diet T3 had higher ADG (0.49 kg and 1.17 kg, respectively) and comparatively lower feed costs (156 BDT/kg LWG and 96.78 BDT/kg LWG, respectively). But crossbred (L × HF) bulls showed the highest ADG (1.17 kg) and the lowest feed cost (96.78 BDT/kg LWG). Therefore, considering the growth performance and cost per kg gain of the experimental animals, it may be concluded that the crossbred (Lx HF) bulls treated with T3 diet may be used for economic organic beef production in Bangladesh.
出处 《Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology(A)》 2015年第9期770-781,共12页 农业科学与技术(A)
关键词 Feed treatment growth performance FCR cost per gain. 杂种公牛 饲料转化率 牛肉生产 生长性能 经济学 杂交 平均日增重 干物质采食量
作者简介 Nathu Ram Sarker, Ph.D., research fields: animal nutrition and feeds and forage technology.
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Akbar, M. A., Islam, S. M. A., and Tareque, A. M. M. 1990. "Effects of Different Levels of Molasses Addition during Ensiling of Urea Rice Straw on Its Nutritive Value in Buffalo Calves." lnd. J. Anita. Sci. 7 (3): 227-8.
  • 2Rahman, M. A., Alam, A. M. M., and Shahjalal, M. 2009. "Supplementation of Urea-Molasses-Straw Based Diet with Different Levels of Concentrate for Fattening of Emaciated Bulls." Pak. J.. Bio. ScL 12 (13): 970-5.
  • 3Roy, B. K., Huque, K. S., Sarker, N. R., Hossain, S. M. J., Rana, M. S., and Munsi, M. N. 2013. "Study on Growth and Meat Quality of Native and Brahman Crossbred Bulls at Different Ages." In Proceedings of the BLRI Annual Research Review Workshop 2012-2013.
  • 4Banerjee, G. C. 2011. "Animal Nutrition." In A Textbook of Animal Husbandry, 8th ed.. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd..
  • 5Huque, K. S., and Sultana, N. 2007. "Review on Feeding, Nutrition and Growth Performance of Native Male Cattle of Bangladesh, and Comparison with Feedlot Beef Animals." Bang. J. Anim. Sci. 36:113-35.
  • 6Rashid, M. M., Huque, K. S., Hoque, M. A., Sarker, N. R., and Bhuiyan, A. K. F. H. 2015. "Effect of Concentrate to Roughage Ratio on Cost Effective Growth Performance of Brahman Crossbred Calves." J. Agri. Sci. Tech. A 5 (4):286-95.
  • 7Albert, S. C., Wayne, W., and Zappe, C. 2008. Data Analysis and Decision Making with Microsoft Excel, 3rd ed.. Hampshire, United Kingdom: South-Western College Publishing Co. Ltd..
  • 8Rashid, M. M., Hoque, M. A., Huque, K. S., and Bhuiyan, A. K. F. H. 2015. "Effect of Concentrate Feeding on the Cost Effective Growth Performance of F1 Local x Brahman Bulls in Bangladesh." Livestock Res Rural Dev. 27 (5).
  • 9Zahradkova, R., Barton, L., Bures, D., Teslik, V., and Kudrna, V. 2010. "Comparison of Growth Performance and Slaughter Characteristics of Limousin and Charolais Heifers." Archiv Tierzucht 53 (5): 520-8.
  • 10Fox, D. G., Tedeschi, L. O., and Guiroy, P. J. 2001. Determining Feed Intake and Feed Efficiency of Individual Cattle Fed in Groups. A Report, Beef Improvement Federation, San Antonio, TX.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部