期刊文献+

基于交互记忆系统的知识整合研究 被引量:1

Research of Knowledge Integration base on the Transactive Memory System
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的考查团队内部基于交互记忆系统的知识整合问题,探索团队内部交互记忆系统及其专长性维度、可信性维度、协调性维度与知识整合的关系。方法采用问卷调查的方法。对176个团队样本进行调查。结果在团队中,交互记忆系统及其三个维度与知识整合存在显著正相关关系,其中可信性维度对知识整合的影响最大。结论在团队中,交互记忆系统能够促进知识整合,并且其专长性、可信性、协调性维度均能对知识整合产生不同正向影响,其中,可信性维度对知识整合的正向影响最大。 Objective Investigating the relationship between transactive memory system(TMS,including its three dimensions - specialization, credibility, coordination) and knowledge integration within teams. Methods Analyzing the survey data collected from 176 social cooperative teams. Results TMS correlates with knowledge integration, and both the specialization, credibility, coordination correlate with knowledge integration. Besides, the dimension of credi- bility is the most important factor. Conclusion TMS and its dimensions (specialization, credibility, coordination) can foster knowledge integration within teams, and the dimension of credibility is the most important factor.
出处 《人类工效学》 2016年第3期23-28,共6页 Chinese Journal of Ergonomics
基金 国家自然基金(71102114) 浙江省自然基金(LY16G020019) 浙江理工大学企业管理省重点学科研究生科研项目(qyglyb201409) 浙江理工大学知识管理研究创新团队
关键词 交互记忆系统 知识整合 专长性 可信性 协调性 团队合作 组织行为 创新 人力资源管理 transactive memory system knowledge integration specialization credibility coordination group cooperation organization behavior creativity human resources manayment
作者简介 周琰掂(1991-),女,浙江温州人,硕士,研究方向:团队管理,(电话)13738015297(电子信箱)jillinyz@126.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献110

  • 1高巍,倪文斌.学习型组织知识整合研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),2005,7(3):86-91. 被引量:14
  • 2张志学,Paul S.Hempel,韩玉兰,邱静.高技术工作团队的交互记忆系统及其效果[J].心理学报,2006,38(2):271-280. 被引量:67
  • 3史晓白,朱永新.冲突性学习:组织中知识创新的驱动力[J].教育发展研究,2006,26(10):39-43. 被引量:2
  • 4Bowers, C. A. , J, A. Pharmer, & E. Salas. When member homogeneity is needed in work teams: A meta- analysis[ J]. Small Group Research, 2000, 31 (3) : 305 -327.
  • 5Webber, S. S. and L. M. Donahue. Impact of highly and less job - related diversity on workgroup cohesion and performance: A meta - analysis [ J ]. Journal of Management, 2001, 27(2) : 141 -162.
  • 6Pelled, L. H., K. M. Eisenhardt, & K. R. Xin. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance [ J ]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44:1 -28.
  • 7Milliken H. J., & L. L. Martins. Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21:402 -433.
  • 8Jackson, S. E. , A. Joshi, & N. L. Erhardt. Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications[ J]. Journal of Management, 2003,29(6) : 801 - 830.
  • 9Knight, D, C. L. Pearee, K. G. Smith, J. D. Olian, H. P. Sims, K. A. Smith, & P. Flood. Top management team diversity, group process and strategic consensus[ J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20:445 -465.
  • 10Ancona, D. G. , & D. F. Caldwell. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams[ J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1992, 37:634-665.

共引文献228

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部