期刊文献+

茶假眼小绿叶蝉抗联苯菊酯品系和敏感品系解毒酶活性及增效作用研究 被引量:9

Activities of the Detoxifying Enzymes and Synergism in the Bifenthrin-resistant and Susceptible Strains of Tea Leafhopper, Empoasca vitis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了明确茶假眼小绿叶蝉(Empoasca vitis)对联苯菊酯代谢抗性相关的解毒酶,本研究采用室内生物测定和生化分析方法,比较了假眼小绿叶蝉抗联苯菊酯品系和敏感品系的3种解毒酶活性差异,并分析了3种增效剂对联苯菊酯的增效作用。解毒酶活性测定表明,茶假眼小绿叶蝉抗联苯菊酯品系羧酸酯酶(Car E)、细胞色素P450氧化酶O-脱甲基(PNOD)、谷胱甘肽-S-转移酶(GST)比活力都高于敏感品系,3种解毒酶活性分别为敏感品系的2.09倍、4.34倍和1.59倍。增效剂磷酸三苯酯(TPP)、增效醚(PBO)和顺丁烯二酸二乙酯(DEM)在茶假眼小绿叶蝉敏感品系中的增效比分别为1.04、1.09、1.00,而在联苯菊酯抗性品系中的增效比分别为1.80、7.97、1.03。上述结果证明,羧酸酯酶和细胞色素P450氧化酶活性的增强在茶假眼小绿叶蝉对联苯菊酯的抗性产生中起到了重要的作用。 Tea green leafhopper, Empoasca vitis, is the most serious pest in tea gardens. The detoxifying enzyme activities and synergism in the bifenthrin-resistant and susceptible leafhopper were measured via biochemical methods and bioassays to clarify their potential relationship to the resistance of tea leafhopper to bifenthrin. The detoxifying enzyme activity tests showed that the activities of carboxylesterase (CarE), Cytochrome P450-mediated O-demethylation activity toward p-nitroanisole (PNOD) and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) in the resistant strain were all higher than those in susceptible strain. The activit ies of the three detoxifying enzymes in bifenthrin-resistant strain were 2.09, 4.34 and 1.59 folds those of the susceptible strain respectively. Synergism tests showed that the synergist ratios of triphenyl phosphate (TPP), piperonyl buoxide (PBO) and diethyl maleate (DEM) were 1.04, 1.09, and 1.00 folds respectively in the bifenthrin-susceptible strain and 1.80, 7.97 and 1.03 foldsrespectively in the bifenthrin-resistant strain. These results indicate that CarE and PNOD play important roles in bifenthrin resistance of tea leafhoppers.
出处 《茶叶科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期323-329,共7页 Journal of Tea Science
基金 福建省自然科学基金(2013J01112)
关键词 茶假眼小绿叶蝉 联苯菊酯 抗性 解毒酶 增效作用 Empoasca vitis bifenthrin resistance detoxifying enzymes synergism
作者简介 李建宇,男,助理研究员,主要从事农业昆虫与害虫防治、农药毒理与生物安全研究.
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1边磊,孙晓玲,陈宗懋.假眼小绿叶蝉的日飞行活动性及成虫飞行能力的研究[J].茶叶科学,2014,34(3):248-252. 被引量:13
  • 2Pu X Y, Feng M G, Shi C H. Impact of three application methods on the field efficacy of a Beauveria bassiana-based mycoinsecticide against the false-eye leafhopper, Empoasca vitis (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) in the tea canopy [J]. Crop Protection, 2005, 24(2): 167-175.
  • 3张聪,刘慧刚,章晓凤.联苯菊酯对靶标生物及非靶标生物毒性的对映体差异[J].浙江工业大学学报,2009,37(4):366-371. 被引量:9
  • 4王念武,徐金汉,陈峥,翁慧,张灵玲,关雄.不同茶园假眼小绿叶蝉抗药性比较[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2004,33(2):169-173. 被引量:42
  • 5庄家祥,傅建炜,苏庆泉,李建宇,占志雄.福建省茶小绿叶蝉抗药性的地区差异[J].茶叶科学,2009,29(2):154-158. 被引量:78
  • 6邢剑飞,刘艳,颜冬云.昆虫对拟除虫菊酯农药的抗性研究进展[J].环境科学与技术,2010,33(10):68-74. 被引量:24
  • 7Zhu YC, Snodgrass GL. Cytochrome P450 CYP6X1 cDNAs and mRNA expression levels in three strains of the tarnished plant bug Lygus lineolaris (Heteroptera: Miridae) having different susceptibilities to pyrethroid insecticide [J]. Insect Molecular Biology, 2003, 12(1): 39-49.
  • 8Li Xianchun, Schuler MA, Berenbaum MR. Molecular mechanisms of metabolic resistance to synthetic and natural xenobiotics [J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 2007, 52: 231-253.
  • 9农业部农药检定所. NY/T 1154.14-2008. 农药室内生物测定试验准则 杀虫剂 第14部分: 浸叶法 [S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011.
  • 10Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding [J]. Analytical Biochemistry, 1976, 7(1/2): 248-254.

二级参考文献121

共引文献155

同被引文献124

引证文献9

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部