摘要
在法律与政治权力的关系问题上,哈贝马斯批判了韦伯法律社会学的法律政治权力化倾向,以及帕森斯结构功能主义的政治权力法律化倾向,认为两者都没有正确把握好法律与政治权力之间的内在关系。哈贝马斯采用商谈理论建构了法律与政治权力之间的相互构成关系,这种关系要求重构权利理论,发挥法律在交往权力向行政权力转化过程中的转换器作用。哈贝马斯的商谈方案突出了权利的基础地位和法律的转换器作用,提供了论证法律与政治权力相互构成关系的显性路径,但在实践中带有乌托邦色彩。
In terms of the relationship between laws and political power,Habermas criticized the politicalization of laws of Weber’s legal sociology and the constitutionalization of political power of Parsons’structural functionalism in that they didn’t handle properly the relationship between laws and political power. Habermas constructed the reciprocal relationship between laws and political power based on the discourse theory.This relationship calls for the reconstruction of power theories and emphasizes the converting role laws should play in changing communicative power into political power.Habermas’scheme of discourse theory highlights the basic status of rights and the converting role of laws and provides an explicit path of verifying the reciprocal construction of laws and political power. However,it turns out to be utopian in practice.
出处
《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第3期270-275,共6页
Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基金
国家社会科学基金资助项目(15BKS076)
作者简介
刘光斌（1978-）,男,湖南洞口人,湖南大学副教授,哲学博士,主要从事西方马克思主义与法兰克福学派理论研究.
