摘要
20世纪90年代以来,"国学热"方兴未艾,但由于存在实践先行、理论建设滞后的问题,所以造成国学的学科属性不明,这成为制约国学发展的瓶颈。许多高校开展的国学教育,虽然注重知识结构扩展和教育方法创新,但课程体系依然存在驳杂无中心态势。在国学的学科属性上,无需增设新的一级学科,国学属于历史视域中的研究对象,其应归属于中国历史学科。在学科建设上,中国传统文化应当受到更多关注,各高校应积极在中国历史学科基础上组建国学院,积极促进国学研究的开展和传播。
Since the 1990's, there has been a rising craze for Chinese traditional culture in China. However, with the backward theoretical construction, the subject attribute of Chinese traditional culture education is still not clear, which has constrained its disciplinary development. The curriculum system in many universities is still confusing, though much stress has been laid on the expansion of knowledge structure and the innovation of pedagogical methods. As a matter of fact, there is no need to define Chinese Traditional Culture as the first level discipline. It should be categorized as a subject in the field of Chinese history. More schools of Chinese traditional culture should be set up on the basis of Chinese history discipline in universities to promote the development and research of Chinese traditional culture.
出处
《中国石油大学学报（社会科学版）》
2016年第2期103-107,共5页
Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences)
关键词
高校
国学
学科属性.
universities
Chinese traditional culture
subject attributes
作者简介
李桂民（1967-），男，山东金乡人，聊城大学历史文化与旅游学院副教授，博士，研究方向为中国古代史与文化素质教育。
