摘要
目的：探索儿童口腔科2种常用充填材料用于乳磨牙邻牙合面龋洞（Ⅱ类洞）充填治疗的临床疗效。方法：将178名4-6岁儿童266颗乳磨牙Ⅱ类洞随机分为2组,即3M流动树脂组（实验A组）、3M玻璃离子组（对照B组）,对乳磨牙进行充填治疗后1、2年复查比较2种材料治疗的临床疗效。结果：采用3M流动树脂和3M玻璃离子对Ⅱ类洞进行充填治疗后1年成功率分别为96.00%和87.80%,充填治疗后2年成功率分别为95.76%和86.61%,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：3M流动树脂用于乳磨牙邻牙合面龋洞充填治疗的临床效果优于3M玻璃离子。
Objective：To explore the clinical effect of dental filling materials commonly used in pediatric dentistry on the restoration of mesial or distal occlusal surface cavities（classⅡcavity）in primary molars.Methods：266primary molars with classⅡ cavities among 178 children aged 4-6were randomly divided into two groups,namely,the 3Mflowable resin group（experimental group）and 3Mglass ionomer group（matched group）.The clinical effect of two materials was compared after 1and 2years of treatment.Results：Treatment success rates of 3Mflowable composite resin and 3Mglass ionomer for classⅡ cavities were 96.00% and 87.80%respectively after 1year.After 2years,the rates were 95.76%and 86.61%respectively（P〈0.05）.Conclusions：For classⅡcavity in primary molars,the clinical outcome of 3Mflowable composite resin is better than that of 3Mglass ionomer.
出处
《口腔医学研究》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2015年第12期1206-1208,共3页
Journal of Oral Science Research
基金
江苏省高校自然科学基金资助项目(编号:10KJB320026)
关键词
3M流动树脂
3M玻璃离子
Ⅱ类洞
3Mflowable composite resin 3Mglass ionomer ClassⅡ cavity
作者简介
谢妮娜（1983-），女，湖北人，硕士，主治医师，主要从事儿童口腔医学的教学、临床及科研工作。
通讯作者刘宗响，E—mail：408571191@qq．com
