摘要
某种危害环境行为构成犯罪后,必须承担相应的刑事责任,即为环境犯罪的刑事责任。环境犯罪的刑事责任是环境犯罪的法律后果,也是对环境犯罪适用刑罚或非刑罚处理方法的前提。在追究环境犯罪的刑事责任时,应当奉行责任谦抑原则、责任前置原则和经济制裁原则。相比德国、日本,我国《刑法》为环境犯罪配置的刑罚整体偏重,不能完全满足预防性环保的刑事政策的要求,不利于合理追究其刑事责任。
When some harmful behavior against the environment had constituted a crime, it must bear the corresponding criminal responsibility, which is the criminal responsibility of environ- mental crimes. It is not only the legal consequences, but also the premise of application of penalty or non-penalty methods. On investigating the criminal responsibility, it should pursue the principles of modesty, preposition and economic sanctions. Compared to Germany and Japan, the whole pun- ishment in our criminal law for environmental crimes tends to severe, that can negatively affect pre- ventive criminal policy and appropriate criminal responsibility.
出处
《时代法学》
2015年第5期35-42,共8页
Presentday Law Science
基金
2013年国家社科基金年度项目"公害犯罪的惩治与传统刑法理论的创新研究"(批准号:13BFX051))
中国法学会2014年度部级法学研究课题"污染环境罪的客观归责研究"(课题编号:CLS(2014)D038)之阶段性成果
关键词
环境犯罪的刑事责任
概念
特征
原则
实现方式
criminal responsibility of environmental crimes
conception
property
principle
Implementation
作者简介
李冠煜，男，华中师范大学法学院讲师，法学博士，主要研究方向：刑法学。
