基于被引速率指标识别睡美人文献及其“王子”——以2014年诺贝尔化学奖得主Stefan Hell的睡美人文献为例被引量：30

Identifying "Sleeping Beauties" and the Princes Who Woke Up Sleeping Beauties in Terms of Citation Speed Measures:A Case Study of the Key Publications by Stefan W.Hell

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要目的：引入时间因素，从文献引文轨迹特征和累积被引速率快慢的角度验证Hell（1994）是否为睡美人文献，并分析其唤醒机制。方法：提出被引速率和延迟承认指数识别睡美人文献；与睡美人文献的同被引速率、共同延迟承认指数识别王子文献，并应用CitNetExporler分析睡美人及其王子文献之间的有向引用网络。结果：Hell（1994）被引速率最慢、延迟承认指数最高，被引次数的年代分布特征同时证明其是睡美人。另外，不仅验证了Nature Methods科学史评论中提到的Hell（2000）是唤醒Hell（1994）的王子，还发现另一篇王子Hell（2003），以及两篇“王子的扈从”——Betzig（2006）和Rust＆Zhuang（2006），四者与Hell（1994）的同被引轨迹和睡美人本身的引文轨迹近乎完全一致。结论：结合被引速率和延迟承认指数，可较快识别出文献集合中的睡美人文献；在睡美人所有施引文献的参考文献中，发表于睡美人文献引用突增年，同被引速度、共同延迟承认指数分别与睡美人文献的被引速率、延迟承认指数越接近，越有可能是王子文献。王子文献可能不止一篇，它（们）本身是高被引文献且往往发表于更高影响力的期刊。在预测零被引或低被引论文未来高被引的潜力时，变革性研究类文献可作为重要线索。 Objective： Based on citation curve and citation speed, which measures how fast a paper accumulates its citations, we try to investigate whether a paper by Nobel laureate Stephan W. Hell, hereafter noted as Hell （1994） , is a Sleeping Beauty document and identify the Princes who wake up the Sleeping Beauty, if that＇s the case. Methods： Two pairs of indicators, i.e. Citation Speed and Delayed Recognition Index（ DRl） as well as Co-Citation Speed and co-Delayed Recognition Index（cDR1） are proposed for rapidly discovering Sleeping Beauties and their Princes. CitNetExporler is used to reveal direct citation networks composed of the concerned documents. Results： There was a significant pattern of delayed recognition revealed by three aspects： Hell（1994）＇s citation distribution over 1994 -2014 period, a very slow citation speed and very high DRI. We did not only find that Hell（2000） is the first prince, but also detected another prince i. e. Hell（2003） and two ＂retinues＂ of the prince i.e. Betzig（2006） and Rust ＆ Zhuang（2006）. It seems that these four documents （two princes and two retinues） led more authors to refer to Hell（1994）. Conclusions： Citation Speed and DRI are proved effective metrics for distinguishing ＂ sleeping beauties＂ citation patterns from ＂flash in the pan＂ patterns. By examining the reference list of articles citing Sleeping Beauties, one can discern ＇ Prince＇ articles characterized by the following features： 1 ） They were published not long after Sleeping Beauty＇s awakening; 2） They are highly co-cited with Sleeping Beauty; 3 ） They have almost the same co-citation speed and co-Delayed Recognition Index with Sleeping Beauty. A Sleeping Beauty may need a prince plus other agents to wake her up, and those documents with awakening function tend to be highly cited articles also and published in journals with higher impact than the journals publishing sleeping beauties. Publications belonging to so-called transformative research, when less cited, may be given special attention, because they may almost suddenly attract a lot of attention after a period of time, as reflected in our ease.

作者杜建武夷山

机构地区南京大学信息管理学院中国医学科学院医学信息研究所中国科学技术信息研究所

出处《情报学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期508-521,共14页 Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information

基金国家自然科学基金“论文零被引的时间演化规律影响因素及其应用研究”(No.71373252) 中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项课题“引文轨迹特征识别及其在学术推荐中的应用”(No.14R0106)研究成果之一

关键词被引速率睡美人延迟承认诺贝尔奖 citation speed,sleeping beauties,delayed recognition, nobel prize in chemistry

分类号 O6-19 [理学—化学] G353.1 [文化科学—情报学]

作者简介杜建，男，1986年生，南京大学信息管理学院博士生，中国医学科学院医学信息研究所馆员，主要研究方向：科学计量学、医学科研评价。E-mail：windowsdujian@163．com。武夷山，男，1958年生，中国科学技术信息研究所研究员，南京大学博士生导师。主要研究方向：情报学、科技管理、科学计量学。通讯作者：武夷山，E-mail：wuyishan@istic．ac．cn。

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献23

1席鹏.有感于超分辨获得2014诺贝尔化学奖[EB/OL].[2014- 12 - 23 ]. http ://biog. scieneenet, c:n/blog - 499502 - 834005. html.
2Wyatt H V. Knowledge and prematurity-journey from transformation to DNA[J]. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 1961, 18(2): 149-156.
3Stent G S. Prematurity and uniqueness in scientific discovery [J]. Scientific American, 1972, 227(6) : 84-93.
4Cole S. Professional standing and the reception of scientific discoveries[ J ]. American Journal of Sociology, 1976, 76 (2) : 286-306.
5Garfield E. More delayed recognition. Part 1. Examples from the genetics of color blindness, the entropy of short- term memory, phosphoinositides, and polymer Rheology [J]. Current Contents, 1989, 12(38): 3-8.
6Garfield E. More delayed recognition. Part 2. From inhibin to scanning electron microscopy [ J ]. Current Contents, 1990, 13(9): 3-9.
7van Raan A F J. Sleeping beauties in science[ J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 59(3): 467-472.
8李江,姜明利,李玥婷.引文曲线的分析框架研究——以诺贝尔奖得主的引文曲线为例[J].中国图书馆学报,2014,40(2):41-49. 被引量：64
9Baumgartner S E, Leydesdorff L. Group-Based Trajectory Modeling (GBTM) of Citations in Scholarly Literature: Dynamic Qualities of "Transient" and "Sticky Knowledge Claims" [ J ]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 65 (4 : 797-811.
10Gl~inzel W, Garfield E. The myth of delayed recognition [J]. Scientist, 2004, 18(11): 8-9.

二级参考文献48

1National Science Foundation. NSF Funded Nobel Prize Win ners in Science Through 2010, October 12, 2010. http;// www. nsf. gov/news/news summ. jsp? cntn id= 100683, 2010年11月2日13.
2National Science Foundation. NSF at a Glance, 2010年4月12日.
3National Science Foundation. NSF Sensational 60, 2010. http://www.nsf. gov/about/history/sensational60, pdf, 2010年11月9日.
4National Science Board. Overview of Approaches for Identif- ying, Reviewing, and Supporting Transformative Research, Working Paper of the National Science Board, September, 2004.
5史蒂芬·科尔著,林建成,王毅译.科学的制造.上海:上海人民出版社,2001年.
6National Science Board. Summary of National Science Board Workshop:Identifying, Reviewing and Funding Transformative Research, September, 2004.
7Walter E. Stumph. "Peer" Review, Science, 22 February, 1980, 207: 822-823. 转引自 Daryl E Chubin and Edward J Hackett. Peerless Science: Peer Review and U. S. Science Policy. New York: State University of New York Press, 1990.
8Alexander A Berezin. Discouragement of innovation by over competitive research funding. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 2001, 26(2): 97-102.
9National Science Board. Enhancing Support of Transformative Research at the National Science Foundation. Draft for Public Comment, February 8, 2007.
10National Science Foundation. The Second Annual Report of the National Science Foundation: Fiscal Year 1952. U S Government Printing Office, Washington 25, DC, 1952i.