摘要
在与西方传统哲学的对峙中,中国哲学、马克思主义哲学以及实用主义处于同一个阵营。这是以伦理学为中心的哲学与以认识论为中心的哲学的对峙。在中国哲学和马克思主义哲学之间,具有一种张力:前者强调个人的自我超越,后者重视社会的公平正义。此种不同路径在实用主义内部皆可找到:爱默生和詹姆斯是个人主义的代表,而杜威则与马克思主义有着更多的共鸣。用罗蒂的办法,分离二者,使其各守其位,各司其职,或许是种不错的选择。
Chinese philosophy, Marxist philosophy and pragmatism stand in the same camp in opposing the Western traditional philosophy. It is the opposition between two kinds of philosophy: one regards ethical concern as the axis, another takes epistemology as the center. A tension could be found between Chinese and Marxist philosophy: the former emphasizes individual's self-cultivation, the later cares more about social justice. Both of them have their partners in pragmatism. Emerson and James can be taken as the main representatives of individualism, whereas Dewey is more intimate to Marxist philosophy. Keeping their own positions to play different roles is comparatively a good choice.
出处
《学术月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第7期5-12,共8页
Academic Monthly
基金
国家社科基金重大课题"实用主义研究"(14ZDB022)的阶段性成果
关键词
中国哲学
马克思主义哲学
实用主义
自我超越
社会公正
Chinese philosophy, Marxist philosophy, pragmatism, self-transcendence, social justice
作者简介
作者陈亚军,南京大学哲学系教授、复旦大学杜威中心兼职研究员(江苏南京210093)。