期刊文献+

综合护理对产褥期母婴健康状况的影响 被引量:5

Effects of comprehensive nursing care on the maternal and neonatal health status of puerperal period
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨综合护理对产褥期母婴住院期间健康状况的影响。方法选取134名产妇接受综合护理,为综合护理组;167名产妇接受常规护理,为常规护理组。对比两组产妇和新生儿健康状况,同时使用焦虑自评量表和抑郁自评量表对产妇进行心理测评,对比不同护理服务对产妇心理干预的影响。结果综合护理组的产妇并发症为23.13%,低于常规护理组的40.12%,差异有统计学意义(χ^2=9.768,P〈0.01);新生儿并发症的发生率综合护理组为31.35%,低于常规护理组的49.71%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=10.318,P〈0.01);两组产妇入院时心理测评差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),出院时综合护理组焦虑自评量表和抑郁自评量表得分分别为(40.01±2.33),(43.17±1.93)分,均优于常规护理组的(47.31±4.33),(51.63±2.49)分,差异有统计学意义(t 值分别为8.093,5.681;P 〈0.01)。结论综合护理能减少产妇与新生儿并发症,心理护理能明显改善患者心理状况,是较好的产科护理模式。 Objective To investigate the effects of comprehensive nursing care on the maternal and neonatal health status ofpuerperal period. Methods 134 cases of maternal accepted comprehensive care which called comprehensive care group; 167 cases received the routine nursing care which called the routine care group. The maternal and neonatal health status of the two groups was compared, and using the Self-rating Anxiety Scale ( SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale ( SDS) to evaluate psychological situation of the mothers. The psychological situation was compared. Results The incidence of maternal complications of comprehensive nursing group was 23. 13%, which was significantly lower than 40. 12% of the routine care group (χ^2 =9. 768, P〈0. 01). The incidence of neonatal complications of comprehensive nursing group was 31. 35%, which was significantly lower than49. 71% of the routine care group (χ^2 =10. 318,P〈0. 01). There was no difference in psychological evaluation of the two groups before hospital. The score of SAS and SDS of the comprehensive nursing group were (40. 01 ± 2. 33) and (43. 17 ± 1. 93), which were significantly lower than(47. 31 ± 4. 33) and (51. 63 ± 2. 49) of the routine care group (t=8. 093,5. 681;P〈0. 01). Conclusions The comprehensive nursing can reduce maternal and neonatal complications, and can obviously improve the psychological status of patients, which make the comprehensive nursing care a better obstetric nursing mode.
作者 黄海珍
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2015年第14期1678-1681,共4页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词 护理 产后期 母婴 并发症 Nursing Maternal puerperal period Maternal and neonatal Complication
作者简介 通信作者:黄海珍,Email:1329266055@qq.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献78

  • 1卢建华,吴建国,吴静娜,王福影,徐文君,李星.构建适合中国国情的健康管理体系[J].中国全科医学,2009,12(3):212-215. 被引量:84
  • 2洪小娟,车晓惠,江良英.46例死胎引产孕产妇的心理疏导[J].当代护士(下旬刊),2010,17(4):113-114. 被引量:5
  • 3李桦,公茂礼.产褥感染病因分析及护理体会[J].实用医技杂志,2006,13(8):1364-1365. 被引量:10
  • 4吴文源.焦虑自评量表[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:235-238.
  • 5沈晓明,王卫平.儿科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:199.
  • 6汤毓华.汉密顿抑郁量表.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,12.
  • 7崔英华.妇产护理学.郑州:河南科学技术出版社,2006:112-113.
  • 8汤毓华.汉密顿焦虑量表.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:253-255.
  • 9戴晓阳.常用心理评估量表手册[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2011:13-19.
  • 10SheehD JanarsJ BakrR 等 司天梅 舒良 孔庆梅 等译.简明国际神经精神访谈(中文版).中国心理卫生杂志,2009,:1-29.

共引文献4239

同被引文献43

引证文献5

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部