期刊文献+

疑似新型冠状病毒肺炎病区护理人员的心理干预效果分析 被引量:3

Investigation on psychological status of nursing staff in suspected coronavirus disease 2019 and analysis of intervention effect
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨在疑似新型冠状病毒肺炎病区工作的护理人员的心理健康状态及相关的护理对措。方法采用焦虑自评量表(Self-Rating Anxiety Scale,SAS),调查我院感染科隔离病区参与收治疑似新型冠状病毒肺炎患者工作的50名护理人员,在刚进入隔离病区时、进入隔离病区2周后的心理状态,针对评估结果,进行提高对疾病的认知水平及防护能力、改善饮食与生活环境、优化工作流程、加强心理护理等系统性的干预。结果刚进入隔离病区收治护理疑似新型冠状病毒肺炎患者时,护士的SAS评分为(39.15±5.29)分,与全国常模(29.78±10.07)分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),提示护士焦虑水平高。通过系统性的干预,2周后护士的SAS得分降至(29.18±6.67)分,与干预前比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论通过不间断培训、人文关怀、流程优化、心理疏导等系统性的干预,可以改善在疑似新型冠状病毒肺炎病区工作的护理人员的心理状态,保证护理人员的心理健康及工作积极性。 Objective To investigate the mental health status of nursing staff in suspected coronavirus disease2019 ward and related nursing measures. Methods Using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SAS),a survey was made of 50 caregivers involved in the treatment of patients with suspected new coronary pneumonia in the isolation ward of the infectious disease department of our hospital. When entering the isolation ward,they entered the isolation The psychological state of the ward after 2 weeks,based on the assessment results,through systematic interventions such as improving the cognitive level and protective ability of the disease,improving the diet and living environment,optimizing the work process,and strengthening psychological care. Results The nurses’ SAS score was 39.15±5.29 when they were admitted to the isolation ward for the care of patients with coronavirus disease 2019,which was statistically significant compared with the national norm 29.78±10.07(P<0.05),suggesting that the nurse had a high level of anxiety. After systemic intervention,the SAS anxiety level of nurses decreased to 29.18 ±6.67 after 2 weeks,which was significantly different from that before intervention(P<0.05). Conclusion Through systematic interventions such as continuous training,humanistic care,process optimization,and psychological counseling,the psychological state of nursing staff in suspected coronavirus disease 2019 areas can be improved,and their mental health and work motivation can be guaranteed.
作者 李素红 李映花 谭清华 李小金 邓瑾 LI Suhong;LI Yinghua;TAN Qinghua;LI Xiaojin;Deng Jin
出处 《中华护理杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第S01期85-87,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nursing
关键词 新型冠状病毒肺炎 疑似 一线护理人员 心理调查 干预效果分析 Coronavirus Disease 2019 Suspected First-line Nursing Staff Psychological Investigation Intervention Effect Analysis
作者简介 李素红,女,本科,主管护师,E-mail:465181932@qq.com;通信作者:李小金,E-mail:lixiaojincool@163.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1吴文源.焦虑自评量表[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:235-238.
  • 2汤毓华.汉密顿抑郁量表.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,12.
  • 3汤毓华.汉密顿焦虑量表.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:253-255.
  • 4戴晓阳.常用心理评估量表手册[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2011:13-19.
  • 5SheehD JanarsJ BakrR 等 司天梅 舒良 孔庆梅 等译.简明国际神经精神访谈(中文版).中国心理卫生杂志,2009,:1-29.
  • 6世界卫生组织 范肖东 汪向东 于欣 等译.ICD-10精神与行为障碍分类[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1993.38-57.
  • 7舒良.自评抑郁量表.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:194-196.
  • 8Chagas MHN, Tumas V, Loureiro SR, et al. Validity of a Brazilian version of the Zung self-rating depression scale for screening of de- pression in patients with Parkinson's disease [ J]. Parkinsonism Re- lat Disnrd, 2010, 16(1) :42 -45.
  • 9Passik SD, Kirsh KL, Donaghy KB, et al. An Attempt to Employ the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale as a "Lab Test" to Trigger Follow-Up in Ambulatory Oncology Clinics: Criterion Validity and Detection [ J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2001, (21 ) 4: 273 - 280.
  • 10许又新.精神病理学[M].2版.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2010:81-91.

共引文献4272

同被引文献53

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部