期刊文献+

不同土地制度下垦区与农区农户经营行为对比分析 被引量:5

Comparative analysis on farmers' management behaviors under different land systems in reclamation and agricultural areas
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究不同制度下的农户经营行为,基于富锦市垦区与农区80户农户调查数据,比较他们的生产规模、耕地利用结构、农户经营行为和经济效益。结果表明:(1)不同土地制度下,垦区户均耕地规模为6.98hm2,高于农区3.64 hm2。(2)垦区地均、户均农业生产成本分别为15 635.85元/hm2、10.91万元,远高于农区的7 955.10元/hm2、2.90万元,物质生产成本均在84%以上。(3)垦区农户地均粮食产值与农业纯收入分别为22 110.00、6 474.15元/hm2,均高于农区的12 950.40、4 995.30元/hm2;而农业补贴标准相近。就户均水平而言,垦区粮食产值、农业纯收入和农业补贴分别为15.43万、4.52万、0.75万元,高于农区的4.71万、1.81万、0.37万元。但农区农户计入兼业收入3.31万元后,户均收入为5.49万元,稍高于垦区的5.27万元/户。 This paper analyzes and compares the production scale, arable land use structure, behaviors and economic benefits of households based on the survey data of 80 households in the reclamation and agricultural regions in Fujin County. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) per household scale of arable land is 6.98 hm2 in the reclamation region, obviously higher than that in the agricultural area (3.64 hm2). (2) In the reclamation region, the agricultural cost of production is 15 635.85 Yuan/hm2, much higher than that in the agricultural region (7 955.10 Yuan/hm2). The household level costs of agricultural production invested in the reclamation and agricultural regions are 109 100 Yuan and 29 000 Yuan, respectively. The reclamation households are focus on agricultural production, however there exits the multiple job-holding's behavior for the agricultural region households. (3) The grain output and agricultural net income for reclamation households are 22 110.00 Yuardhm2 and 6 474.15 Yuan/hm2, respectively, both higher than those in the agricultural region (12 950.40 Yuan/hm2, 4 995.30 Yuan/hm2), and the agricultural subsidy standard is similar. In terms of per household level, the grain output, agricultural net income and agrieuhural subsidy in the reclamation region are 154 300 Yuan, 45 200 Yuan and 7 500 Yuan, respectively, higher than those in the agricultural region (47 100 Yuan, 18 100 Yuan and 3 700 Yuan). But counting 33 100 Yuan of themultiple job-holding's income, the per household income is 54 900 Yuan for agricuhural area farmers, slightly higher than that in the reclamation region (52 700 Yuan/household).
出处 《广东农业科学》 CAS 2015年第6期154-160,共7页 Guangdong Agricultural Sciences
基金 黑龙江省自然科学基金(D201401) 国家自然科学基金(71341049)
关键词 垦区 农区 农户经营行为 土地制度 reclamation region agricultural region farmers' management behavior land system
作者简介 杜国明(1978-),男,博士,副教授,E—mail:nmgdgm@126.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

共引文献1026

同被引文献59

  • 1康壮,佟光霁.黑龙江垦区农业产业化问题研究[J].长春理工大学学报(高教版),2012(5):35-36. 被引量:1
  • 2朱海涛.浙江省家庭农场发展对策研究[D].浙江农林大学,2012.
  • 3董凌芳.结构化理论视野下松江家庭农场制度研究[D].华东理工大学,2013.
  • 4BaleSentis T, Kri~iukaitien~ I. Family farm efficiency across farming types in lithuania and its managerial implications-data envelopment analysis [J]. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 2012, 30 (1): 22-30.
  • 5Allen, Douglas W, Lueck D. Family farm inc [J] . Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, 2000, 15 (1) : 13-17.
  • 6Ciolo~ D. The Diversity of Family Farms is a Strength for World Agriculture [J]. Euro Choices, 2014, 13 (1) : 3-4.
  • 7Dogliotti S, Garc i a M C, Peluffo S, et al. Co- innovation of family farm systems: A systems approach to sustainable agriculture [J]. Agricultural Systems, 2013.
  • 8A.古拉蒂,樊胜根.巨龙与大象:中国和印度农业农村改革的比较研究[J].北京:科学出版社,2009.
  • 9Lawton J. What are the critical success factors for succession planning in family farms? A systematic review [D~. University of Prince Edward Island, 2013.
  • 10宁启文,赵经平.围绕现代农业需求创新金融保险服务构建多方共赢的金融支农协作新机制[N].农民日报,2015-02-28.

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部