摘要
医学的发展使得人体构成与分离部分客体说占据了上风。然而,基于客体说理论上的器官等交易合法化在实践中始终无法得到立法认同。法理上无论所有权客体说还是人格权客体说都存在难以逾越的伦理障碍和逻辑悖论。人是目的,人物殊途。法律不应当介入人格领域,人格领域有自己的运行法则。法律上的人体应当包括蕴含人格要素的人的构成部分和分离部分。分离部分虽暂时分离但仍然是人体也即是主体的一部分。主体说既无理论障碍,也能适应器官捐赠、冷冻胚胎等现实问题。器官捐赠可看作人格之馈赠,冷冻胚胎应当依来源之人的意思处理。
With the development of medical science, the theory that human body constitution and the separation section are objects becomes prevailed. But as an illustration of the object theory, organ trading hasn＇t got the legislative approval till today. In legal theory, no matter the ownership object theory or the personal right object theory both have the insurmountable ethical obstacles and logical paradox. Persons are the purpose. Persons and have different roads. Law shouldn＇t intervene in personality and personality has its own operation principle. Human body in law shall mean person＇s organism and its detached body which include personality factors. Though the detached body is detached from the person, it is sill the body, exactly, part of the body. The subject theory has no barriers in theory and still it can adapt to the reality of organ donation and embryo cryopreservation. Organ donation can be regard as the personality＇s present and embryo cryopreservation shall be treated by the meaning of it owner.
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期94-102,共9页
Journal of Social Sciences
基金
广东省高等学校优秀青年教师培养计划资助项目(项目编号:Yq2013148)的阶段性成果
关键词
人格权
客体
器官移植
分离部分
Personal Right
Object Organ Transplant
Detached Dody
作者简介
张保红，广东韶关学院法学院副教授，中国社科院法学所博士后流动站研究人员（广东韶关512005）
