高管团队沟通对决策绩效的影响:环境动态性的调节作用被引量：28

The Effect of TMT Communication on Decision-Making Performance: The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism

导出

摘要基于团队沟通理论建构模型,探索高管团队沟通对决策绩效的作用机制,同时检验环境动态性的调节作用。对140家企业高管团队的589份有效问卷的实证研究结果表明:沟通频率、沟通氛围以及非正式沟通均对决策绩效产生显著的正向影响;环境动态性正向调节了沟通氛围、非正式沟通与决策绩效之间的关系,而在沟通频率与决策绩效的关系中发挥了负向调节作用。 The decision-making performance largely depends on the communication of Top management team（TMT）. At present, really few research make an inquiry about the effects of TMT communication on the decision-making performance, and fail to give a reasonable explanation about under what conditions TMT communication can achieve better decision-making performance. Based on the team communication theory, this study examines the effects of TMT communication on the decision-making performance, and tests the moderating role of environmental dynamism. The findings from 589 questionnaires from 140 firm TMTs indicate that communication frequency, communication climate and informal communication have positive effects on the decision-making performance. Environmental dynamism positively moderates the relationship between communication climate, informal communication and the decision-making performance, but has a negative moderating effect on the relationship between communication frequency and the decision-making performance.

作者束义明郝振省

机构地区上海理工大学管理学院中国新闻出版研究院

出处《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期170-180,共11页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.

基金国家软科学研究计划项目(2013GXQ4D165) 国家社会科学基金项目(11BGL014) 上海市一流学科建设项目(S1205YLXK)

关键词高管团队团队沟通决策绩效环境动态性 top management team team communication decision-making performance environmental dynamism

分类号 F272 [经济管理—企业管理] F270 [经济管理—企业管理]

作者简介束义明（1973-），男，安徽南陵人，博士研究生，研究方向：组织行为与人力资源管理。

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献39

1Dooley R S,Fryxell G E.Attaining decision quality and commitment from dissent:The moderating effects of loyalty and competence in strategic decision-making teams[J].Academy of Management Journal,1999,42(4):389-402.
2Sarker S,Ahuja M,Sarker S,et al.The role of com- munication and trust in global virtual teams:Social net- work perspective[J].Journal of Management Informa- tion Systems,2011,28(1):273-309.
3Amason A C,Sapienza H J.The effects of top manage- ment team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict[J].Journal of Management,1997,23(4):495-516.
4Murray S R,Peyrefitte J.Knowledge type and commu- nication media choice in the knowledge transfer pro- cess[J].Journal of Managerial Issues,2007,19(1):111-133.
5Macht G A,Nembhard D A,Kim J H,et al.Structu- ral models of extraversion,communication,and team performance[J].International Journal of Industrial Ergo- nomics,2014,44(1):82-91.
6Peters L D,Fletcher K P.Communication strategies and marketing performance:An application of the Mohr and Nevin framework to intra-organizational cross-functional teams[J].Journal of Marketing Manage- ment,2004,20(7/8):41-770.
7Patrashkova R R,McComb S A.Exploring why more communication is not better:Insights from a computa- tional model of cross-functional teams[J].Journal of En- gineering and Technology Management,2004,21(1/2):83-114.
8杨付,张丽华.团队沟通、工作不安全氛围对创新行为的影响:创造力自我效能感的调节作用[J].心理学报,2012,44(10):1383-1401. 被引量：114
9林亚清,赵曙明.构建高层管理团队社会网络的人力资源实践、战略柔性与企业绩效--环境不确定性的调节作用[J].南开管理评论,2013,16(2):4-15. 被引量：126
10Yamak S,Nielsen S,Escriba-esteve A.The role of ex- teraal environment in upper echelons theory:A re- view of existing literature and future research direc- tions[J].Group & Organization Management,2014,39(1):69-109.