《维也纳条约法公约》第31.3条“任何相关国际法规则”研究被引量：4

On the Preservation of International Law System in Treaty Interpretation:From the Perspective of Article 31. 3( c) of VCLT

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要《维也纳条约法公约》第31.3条(c)项在澄清条约模糊、填补空白的同时也留下了诸多疑问:哪些规则具有相关性?"适用于当事国间关系的"这个短语是否对可以适用的国际法规则的范围具有限制性作用?是否是指条约解释之时处于生效状态的国际法的全部?因此,对第31.3条(c)项立法沿革、用语含义以及相关国际司法实践的探究,对于深入了解国际条约解释规则作用的机理具有积极意义。对时际法性质的理解是审视第31.3条(c)项的一个必要前提。条约解释通常难免借助于其后的相关新条约。 There is no consensus as to the following issues in academic circles： whether the international law system and its hierarchy and self- contentedness exist,the meaning of Article 31. 3（ c）,and what role in enhancing the international law system Article 31. 3（ c） plays,and so on. Although ＂fragmentation＂and relative ＂self- contentedness＂still exist in the international law system,the international law has an evolving system on the basis of the common value,the developing hierarchy and the integration of the international law system through Article 3. 3（ c） of VCLT. ＂Fragmentation＂erodes but cannot deny the system of international law. The causes of the erosion of the international law system are complicated. The present situation depends on the reality of the power structure of international community. Article 31. 3（ c） has the function of integration and development of international law,which preserves the system of international law from the perspective of treaty interpretation.

作者冯寿波

机构地区南京信息工程大学公共管理学院

出处《西南政法大学学报》 2015年第1期65-72,共8页 Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law

关键词《维也纳条约法公约》第31.3条(c)项条约解释相关国际法规则 VCLT article 31.3（c） of VCLT treaty interpretation related international law rules

分类号 DF938 [政治法律—国际法学]

作者简介冯寿波（1965-），男，江苏东海人，南京信息工程大学副教授，法学博士。

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献18

1Richard K Garadiner.Treaty Interpretation[M].Oxford University Press,2008:251.
2Hugh Thirlway.The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960-1989 Part Three[M].British Yearbook of International Law,1991,62(1):58.
3约斯特·鲍威林.国际公法规则之冲突——WTO法与其他国际法规则如何联系[M].周忠海,等,译.北京:法律出版社,2005:291.
4D W Greig.Intertemporality and the Law of Treaties[M].London:BIICL,2001:46.
5US-Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline,WT/DS2/AB/R,at 17.
6WT/DS207/R,3 May 2002,para 7.85.
7Oil Platforms(Islamic Republic of Iran v.United States of America)(Merits)[2003]ICJ Reports 161.
8WT/DS58/AB/R,Paras 130,131.
9Golder v.the United Kingdom Series A,vol 18(judgement of 21 February,1975),at 17,para 35.
10Yearbook of ILC,vol II,1966,at 190,para 70.