期刊文献+

碳排放交易政策下供应链碳减排技术投资的博弈分析 被引量:103

The Game Analysis of Carbon Reduction Technology Investment on Supply Chain under Carbon Cap-and-Trade Rules
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对单制造商和单零售商组成的供应链,考虑供应链碳减排技术投资与否两种情形,构建了集中式决策、分散式决策和供应链成员协同决策的博弈模型,探讨了消费者碳足迹敏感系数、碳限额及碳减排成本系数对供应链成员最优决策及减排效果的影响。研究表明,碳交易价格与碳限额呈线性关系时,供应链及制造商的利润与碳限额并不是线性递增的关系,政府合理的制定碳限额能够促使供应链企业有效减少碳排放;当消费者支付意愿依赖于产品碳足迹时,企业可以通过投资碳减排技术在减少碳排放量的同时获取更大的利润,实现环境与经济的协调发展。制造商和零售商通过渠道协作共同决策碳减排水平时,供应链碳排放总量比分散决策情形下明显减少。 Considering two conditions of whether carbon reduction technology is invested or not, two-stage dynamic game model is discussed in a supply chain consisting of a single manufacturer and a retailer under the Carbon Cap-and-Trade Rules. The influence of consumer's sensitivity coefficients on carbon footprint, carbon emission cap and carbon abatement cost coefficient on enterprises' decisions and carbon reduction is studied under the condition of integrated manners, decentralized manners and cooperative policy. The re-sults show that when the carbon trading price depends linearly on the carbon cap, manufacture and supply chain's profits are not linear with the carbon cap, and the government can make enterprises reduce carbon emissions by formulate a reasonable carbon cap. When consumer's willingness to pay for low carbon prod- uct depends on “carbon footprint”, the enterprise can reduce the carbon emission as well as obtain greater profits, through investing carbon emission reduction technology, and then realize coordinated development between environment and economy. Carbon emissions can be reduced significantly when manufacturer and retailer make joint decisions on carbon reduction levels through channel coordination.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第11期44-53,共10页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 教育部新世纪人才计划(NCET-11-0637) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71171082 71202052)
关键词 碳限额与碳交易 消费者行为 碳减排技术投资 博弈 carbon cap-and-trade rules consumer behavior investment of carbon reduction technology game
作者简介 骆瑞玲(1980-),女(汉族),甘肃武威人,石河子大学信息科学与技术学院,讲师,华东理工大学博士生,研究方向:低碳供应链.
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Benjaafar S, Li Yanzhi, Daskin M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: Insights from simple models [J]. IEEE Transactions on automation science and engineering, 2013, 10(1):1-18.
  • 2Zhang Jingjiang, Nie Tengfei, Du Shaofu. Optimal e- mission -dependent production policy with stochastic de- mand[J]. International Journal of Society Systems Sci- ence, 2011, 3 (1): 21-39.
  • 3Zhao Rui, Neighbour G, Han Jiaojie, et al. Using game theory to describe strategy selection for environmental risk and carbon emissions reduction in the green supply chain[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process In- dustries, 2012, 25(6): 927-936.
  • 4Du Shaofu, Zhu Lili, Liang Liang, et al . Emission-de-pendent supply chain and environment-policy-making in the cap-and-trade' system [J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 57:61-67.
  • 5谢鑫鹏,赵道致.低碳供应链生产及交易决策机制[J].控制与决策,2014,29(4):651-658. 被引量:19
  • 6赵道致,原白云,徐春明.低碳供应链纵向合作减排的动态优化[J].控制与决策,2014,29(7):1340-1344. 被引量:51
  • 7范进,赵定涛,洪进.消费排放权交易对消费者选择行为的影响——源自实验经济学的证据[J].中国工业经济,2012(3):30-42. 被引量:23
  • 8Liu Zugang, Anderson T D, Cruz J M. Consumer envi- ronmental awareness and competition in two-stage sup- ply chains [J]. European Journal of Operational Re- search, 2012, 218(3); 602-613.
  • 9Kroes J, Subramanian R, Subramanyam R. Operational compliance levers, environmental perforrnanee, and firm performance under cap and trade regulation[J]. Manu- facturing and Service Operations Management, 2012,14 (2). 186-201.
  • 10杨光勇,计国君.构建基于产品生命周期的低碳足迹供应链[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,63(2):65-74. 被引量:26

二级参考文献103

共引文献198

同被引文献801

引证文献103

二级引证文献1014

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部