中国农贷的减贫增收效应:贫困县与非贫困县的分层比较被引量：68

Effect of Poverty Reduction and Income Growth about Loan for Rural Residents in China

导出

摘要本文运用分位数回归(QR)和工具变量分位数回归(IVQR)方法,对比分析了我国2010年贫困县和非贫困县的农户信贷、财政支出等对不同收入水平农民的减贫增收效果。结果显示,农户信贷对非贫困县农民收入增长起到了显著的推动作用;相反,贫困县的农户信贷却并没能成为推动农民收入增长的显著资源要素,且随着分位数条件分布的不断提高,其影响系数服从明显的倒"U''形分布。财政支出仅仅对非贫困县的中高收入和最高收入组的农民增收有积极影响,但对其他收入层次及贫困县农民增收效应均显著为负;农村资本形成对非贫困县最低、中低收入组以及贫困县(最高收入组除外)农民增收具有显著推动作用。 Using cross-sectional data covering poverty and non-poverty counties in China in 2010, this paper investigates the impact of loan for rural residents and fiscal expenditure on poverty reduction of rural residents whose income are inequality. The empiri- cal analysis indicates that. loan for rural residents of the non-poverty counties playes a significant role in promoting farmers＇ income growth. However, for the poverty counties, the loan for rural residents is not significant factor to promote the growth of farmer＇s income, and with the constant improvement of the distribution quantile condition, the influence coefficient obey obvious ＂inverted U-shaped＂ distribution. Fiscal expenditure only do good to the high and highest income group in non-poor counties to increase their income, but to other farmers whose income are not within that level and farmers in poverty counties, the effect is significantly negative. Rural capital formation of non-poor counties minimum, low-income groups and poor counties （except the highest income group） farmers＇ income have a significant role in promoting.

作者王小华王定祥温涛

机构地区西南大学经济管理学院西南大学农业教育发展研究中心

出处《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第9期40-55,共16页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics

基金国家社科基金重大招标项目(11&ZD047) 国家社科基金重点项目(13AJY019) 国家社科基金青年项目(12CJY062) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJC790149) 教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划" 重庆市人文社科重点研究基地项目(12SKB019) 西南大学人文社科基金项目(12XDSKZ005)的资助

关键词农户信贷财政支出贫困农民收入 Loan for Rural residents Fiscal expenditure Poverty Rural Resident＇s Income

分类号 F323.8 [经济管理—产业经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献40

1Aghion P. and Bolton P. , 1997, A Theory of Trickle-Down Growth and Development [J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 64 (2), 151-172.
2Aghion Philippe, Howitt Peter, 2009, The Economics of Growth [M]. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
3Awojobi O. , & Bein M. A. , 2011, Micro financing for Poverty Reduction and Economic Development : a Case for Nigeria [J]. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, (72), 159-168.
4Banerjee, Abhijit V. and Andrew F. Newman. , 1993, Occupational Choice and the Process of De- velopment [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 101 (2), 274-298.
5Burgess R. , & Pande R. , 2004, Do Rural Banks Matter? Evidence from the Indian Social Bank- ing Experiment [R]. Department of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
6Clarke G. , Xu L. C. & Zou H, 2006, Financeand Income Inequality: What Do the Data Tell Us? [J]. Southern Economic Journal, 72, 578-596.
7Chernozhukov V. , & Hansen C. , 2005, An IV Model of Quantile Treatment Effects [J]. Econometrica, 73 (1), 245-261.
8Demirguc-Kunt, Asli and Ross Levine, 2009, Finance and Inequality : Theory and Evidence [J]. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 1, 287-318.
9Efron B. , 1979, Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife [J]. The Annals of Statis- tics, 7 (1), 1--26.
10Gazi Salah Uddin, Muhammad Shahbaz, Mohamed Arouri and Frederic Teulon, 2014, Financial Development and Poverty Reduction Nexus : A Cointegration and Causality Analysis in Bangladesh [J]. E- conomic Modelling, 36, 405-412.