摘要
"八年抗战"与"十四年抗战"两种观点分歧的焦点之一,在于毛泽东分别提出过这两种不同说法。根据历史与逻辑相统一的基本原则,结合毛泽东提及两种说法的特殊历史背景和具体分析对象,发现毛泽东所说的"八年抗战"强调的是七七事变爆发后抗日战争发展到全民族抗战的历史时期;而"十四年抗战"强调的是九一八事变后,中国人民就开启了抗日战争的起点。两种说法显然强调的是不同历史背景中的不同分析对象。因此,从"历史时期"与"历史起点"的视角考察两种观点的分歧,有助于我们更加清晰地认识到"十四年抗战"的界定既符合历史事实,又具有深厚的学理依据。
One of the focus of "eight years of the Anti-Japanese war" and "fourteen years of the Anti-Japanese war" is the talk about Mao Zedong. We found that "eight years of the Anti-Japanese war" emphasized the special historical period when the whole nation fought against Japan after July 7 th incident. However, the view about "fourteen years of the AntiJapanese war" emphasized the Chinese people started the Anti-Japanese war after September 18 th incident in Mao Zedong’s consciousness, so the two statements emphasize different analysis objects in different historical backgrounds. From the perspective of "historical period" and "historical starting point" to inspect the differences two viewpoints could help us clearly recognize that the "fourteen years of the Anti-Japanese war" is not only conform to the historical facts, but also have deep academic basis.
作者
孙宜芳
SUN YiFang(School of Marxism,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433;Party School of the Guangzhou Committee of CPC (Guangzhou Institute of Public Administration),Guangzhou,Guangdong 510070)
出处
《长白学刊》
北大核心
2019年第1期135-141,共7页
Changbai Journal
基金
中国博士后科研基金项目:"中国共产党抗战形象研究(1931-1945)"(2018M631987)
关键词
抗日战争
八年抗战
十四年抗战
学理依据
The Anti-Japanese War
Eight Years
Fourteen Years
Academic Basis
作者简介
孙宜芳(1982-),男,复旦大学马克思主义理论博士后研究人员、法学博士,中共广州市委党校(广州行政学院)党史党建教研部讲师。
