摘要
既有理论对于《公司法解释(三)》第25条规定的隐名出资型善意取得的批判有余,剖析不足,未能进行充分且妥当的回应。《公司法解释(三)》关于隐名出资的相关规定,彰显了制定者认为股权与股东资格可以分属于实际出资人与名义股东的立场。由此,名义股东处分实际出资人的股权自是无权处分。与股东资格分离后的股权虽在变动模式与权利内容上疑似债权,但将其视为债权,不仅无法解释显名权的存在,亦与《公司法解释(三)》相关规定相冲突,更非妥当的价值判断结论。隐名出资场合适用善意取得的难题在于登记难以承载股权“权利外观基础”。对此,宜改进股东名册制度,使股东名册成为股权权利外观。
For the bona fide acquisition of shares in Dormant Contribution of Capital,the existing theory criticized the system excessively,lacked respect and failed to respond effectively.The provisions about Dormant Contribution of Capital of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the Application of the Company Law of the People's Republic of China (Ⅲ )shows the viewpoint that the maker thinks the equity belongs to the actual contributor and the shareholder's qualification belongs to the nominal contributor.Hence,nominal contributor manner the equity of actual contributor's equity is Unauthorized Disposals.After the separation of the shareholder qualification,rights content and change mode of the equity are similar to claim.However,considering it as a claim not only can not explain the right of nomination,it conflicts with the relevant provisions of Dormant Contribution of Capital and is not an appropriate conclusion of value judgments.
出处
《南京大学法律评论》
CSSCI
2018年第1期126-143,共18页
Nanjing University Law Review
关键词
隐名出资
善意取得
股东资格
股权
权利外观
Dormant Contribution of Capital
bona fide acquisition of shares
shareholder's qualification
equity
作者简介
王湘淳,男,中国人民大学法学院博士生。邮编:100872;地址:中国北京市海淀区中关村大街59号中国人民大学明德法学楼1015。
