期刊文献+

Mini-invasive surgery for colorectal cancer 被引量:10

Mini-invasive surgery for colorectal cancer
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 Laparoscopic techniques have been extensively used for the surgical management of colorectal cancer during the last two decades. Accumulating data have demonstrated that laparoscopic colectomy is associated with better short-term outcomes and equivalent oncologic outcomes when compared with open surgery. However, some controversies regarding the oncologic quality of mini-invasive surgery for rectal cancer exist. Meanwhile, some progresses in colorectal surgery, such as robotic technology, single-incision laparoscopic surgery, natural orifice specimen extraction, and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, have been made in recent years. In this article, we review the published data and mainly focus on the current status and latest advances of mini-invasive surgery for colorectal cancer. Laparoscopic techniques have been extensively used for the surgical management of colorectal cancer during the last two decades. Accumulating data have demonstrated that laparoscopic colectomy is associated with better short-term outcomes and equivalent oncologic outcomes when compared with open surgery. However, some controversies regarding the oncologic quality of mini-invasive surgery for rectal cancer exist. Meanwhile, some progresses in colorectal surgery, such as robotic technology, single-incision laparoscopic surgery, natural orifice specimen extraction, and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, have been made in recent years. In this article, we review the published data and mainly focus on the current status and latest advances of mini-invasive surgery for colorectal cancer.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Cancer》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2014年第6期277-284,共8页
关键词 手术治疗 大肠癌 机器人技术 腹腔镜 微创手术 直肠癌 数据表 切除术 Laparoscopy colorectal cancer robotic technology single-incision laparoscopic surgery natural orifice specimen extraction natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery
作者简介 Corresponding Author: Zhi-Xiang Zhou, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, P. R. China. Tel: +86-10-87787110; Fax: +86-10- 87787110; Email: zhzhxpumc@163.com.
  • 相关文献

参考文献70

  • 1Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991,1:144-150.
  • 2Simorov A, Shaligram A, Shostrom V, et al. Laparoscopic colon resection trends in utilization and rate of conversion to open procedure: a national database review of academic medical centers. Ann Surg, 2012,256:462-468.
  • 3Lacy AM, Delgado S, Castells A, et al. The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg, 2008,248:1-7.
  • 4Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, et al. Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus (aparoscopicaliy assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2013,100:75-821.
  • 5Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol, 2009,10:44-52.
  • 6Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg, 2007, 246:655-662.
  • 7Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopicaily assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med, 2004,350:2050-2059.
  • 8Lacy AM, Garcfa-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy- assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet, 2002, 359:2224-2229.
  • 9Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Colon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol, 2005,6:477-484.
  • 10Guillou P J, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients withcolorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2005, 365: 1718-1726.

同被引文献55

引证文献10

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部