期刊文献+

“后撤点并校”时代小规模学校的复兴 被引量:11

The Rival of Rural Small Schools after the Removal-and-Merger Age
原文传递
导出
摘要 撤点并校和举办寄宿制学校是中国农村中小学布局调整、实施集中资源办学、提升教学质量的一项重要政策,也取得了一系列成效,有助于使部分地区的教育资源配置得到优化、学校规模扩大、农村教育质量得到提高。但是盲目的撤点并校也容易导致中国农村基础教育的倒退、小规模学校困境突出。笔者认为,复兴小规模学校是挽救农村教育的根本出路,也是教育均衡发展的重要举措。本文从资源投入、师资队伍建设、多元化教学模式与办学模式方面提出了相关的建议和对策。 The important policies of removal and merger of schools and developing boarding schools in rural areas aim to adjust the layout of the rural primary and middle schools, centralize resources for better education quality, which have some achievements, for example, the optimization of education resource allocation in some areas, the enhancing of the scale of schools, and the improvement of education quality. But blind removal and merger of schools causes the backward rural based-education and the small schools in dilemma. Some researchers point out the rival of small schools is the fundament way to promote the rural education quality and keep the education balance. The article puts forward relevant suggestions and countermeasures such as resource input, teaching staff training, diversified instruction models and school running patterns.
作者 杨兰 张业强
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期68-72,共5页 Research in Educational Development
基金 教育部2012年规划基金项目"‘撤点并校’ 产生的教育资源配置均衡问题及其对策研究--以贵州省为例"(12YJA88 0145) 贵州大学校基金项目"贵州省农村教育资源配置均衡问题研究"的部分成果
关键词 农村 小规模学校 复兴 撤点并校 revival, schools, small scale, rural area
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献25

  • 1傅松涛,杨彬.美国农村社区基础教育现状与改革方略[J].比较教育研究,2004,25(9):47-52. 被引量:46
  • 2傅松涛,赵建玲.美国城乡教育机会均等与“农村教育成就项目”[J].外国教育研究,2006,33(3):35-39. 被引量:21
  • 3Bingler, S. Diamond, Lawrenceetc Dollars and Sense: The Cost Effectiveness of Small Schools,Rural School and Community Trust [M].Knowledgeworks Foundation 2002.
  • 4Patricia J. Kannapel, Alan J. DeYoung. The Rural School Problem in 1999:A Review and Critique of the Literature [J]. Journal of Research in Rural Education, Fall, 1999, Vol. 15, No.2, 67-79.
  • 5Friedkin, N., Necochea, J. School System Size and Performance: Ac0ntingency Perspective[J]. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1988, (3).
  • 6Howley, C. B. School District Size and School Performance[J]. Rural Education Issue Digest,2000,(1-12).
  • 7Randall W. Eberts, Ellen Kehoe Schwartz, and Joe A. Stone. School Reform, School Size, and Student Achievement [J]. Economic Review, 1990, (2).
  • 8Lee ,Smith,High School Size: Which Works Best and for Whom?[J] Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. Fall 1997, Vol. 19, No. 3.
  • 9Driscoll, D., Halcoussis, D., Svorny, D. School District Size and Studentperforrnance[J]. Economics of Education Review, 2003,(22).
  • 10Cotton, Kathleen,Affective and Social Benefits of Small-Scale Schooling[Z].1996.

共引文献119

同被引文献147

引证文献11

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部