期刊文献+

宫颈环形电切术对妊娠结局的影响 被引量:9

The effect of loop electrical excision procedure on pregnancy outcome
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨宫颈环形电切术(LEEP)对妊娠结局和分娩方式的影响。方法采用回顾性病例对照研究,选择因宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)1I~III而行宫颈环形电切术,于术后妊娠并分娩的31例产妇为研究组。按年龄、孕次、产次、经济收入相匹配的原则,选取同期分娩且孕前未行任何宫颈手术的产妇62例为对照组,2组均无并发症,观察2组间的早产儿发生率、胎膜早破发生率、分娩方式及新生儿体重等指标的差异。结果研究组早产率9.68%、胎膜早破发生率6.45%、剖宫产发生率41.94%、新生儿出生体重〈2500g者发生率6.45%;对照组早产率8.06%、胎膜早破发生率4.84%、剖宫产发生率38.71%、新生儿出生体重〈2500g者发生率4.84%,2组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论LEEP可能对妊娠结局无不良影响。 Abstract :Objective To investigate the effect of loop electrical excision procedure (LEEP) on the outcome of subsequent pregnancies and mode of deliveries. Methods A retrospective case-control study was performed. The study group enrolled 31 women,who gave birth after previous LEEP treatment CIN H -m. The control group had 62 women with no history of cervical surgery, who delivered within the same period and were matched by age, gestation, parity and income. Two groups had no complications. The information including preterm birth, premature rupture of membranes( PROM ) , type of deliver- ies and birth weight of the two groups were collected. Results The incidence of preterm birth was 9.68% in study group and 8.06% in control group,the incidence of PROM was 6.45% in study group and 4.84% in control group,cesarean section rate was 41.94% in study group and 38.71% in control group. The incidence of low birth weight was 6.45% in study group and 4.84% in control group, there was no significant difference between the two groups( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclu- sion LEEP showed no bad effect on the outcome of subsequent pregnancies probably.
出处 《中华全科医学》 2014年第2期250-251,共2页 Chinese Journal of General Practice
关键词 宫颈环形电切术 妊娠时限 分娩方式 :Loop electrical excision procedure Duration of pregnancy Mode of delivery
作者简介 通讯作者:晋兴林,E—mail:jxl90099@sina.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献70

  • 1毕蕙,李克敏,廉玉茹.CINⅡ~Ⅲ LEEP治疗后妊娠结局分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(10):1304-1306. 被引量:17
  • 2Mathevet P, Dargent D, Roy M, et al. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP [J]. Gynecol Oncol,1994,54(2): 175- 179.
  • 3Ellenberg SS. Meta-analysis: the quantitive approach to research review [J] .Seminats Oncol, 1988,15(5) : 427.
  • 4Blomfield PI, Buxton J, Dunn J, et al. Pregnancy outcome after large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1993,169(3) : 620 - 625.
  • 5Cruickshank ME, Flannelly G, Campbell DM, et al. Fertility and pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone [J].Obstet Gynecol Sur, 1996,51(3): 168- 169.
  • 6White K,Lindsay M,Raynor BD,et al.Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the cervix [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2001,184(1) : S190.
  • 7Tufano S, Rowin C, Deroche M, et al.Tne effect of loop electroexcision procedure and cone biopsy on pregnancy outcome [ J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2002,187(6) : S84.
  • 8Linda TE,Pepra RK.The outcome of pregnancy after large loop exeisionof the transformalion zone of the cervix [J]. J Obstet Gynecol, 2004,24( 1 ) : 25 - 27.
  • 9Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang WQ, et al. Treatment for cervical lntraepitheiial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery [J] .JAMA,2004,219( 17): 2100- 2106.
  • 10Ganesh A, Ingvild K, Sidsel M, et al. Pregnancy outccrae after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [ J ]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2005,272 ( 2 ) : 109 - 112.

共引文献85

同被引文献112

引证文献9

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部