服务接触中顾客刻板印象的形成与支持:内隐人格理论视角被引量：5

The Formation and Endorsement of Customer's Stereotypes in Service Contacts: From the Perspective of Implicit Personality Theory

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要文章以服务接触中的员工行为为刺激,探讨了顾客所持有的内隐人格理论(实体论/渐变论)在其对服务组织刻板印象的形成与支持中所扮演的角色。通过对254个样本采用2×2被试间实验设计的方式,结合方差分析等方法进行了假设检验。研究结果发现:实体论者较渐变论者更容易在服务接触中通过观察员工行为形成对服务组织的刻板印象,而且实体论者认为这些零散的员工行为足以作为依据对组织做出判断;此外,这种刻板印象一旦形成,无论后续的服务表现如何,实体论者对服务组织的看法都很难改变。研究结论为服务企业特别是新成立的服务企业提供了一个新的质量管理和顾客行为分析视角。 The paper explores enstomers,holding implicit personality theory （entity/gradient theory）,play roles in the forma-tion and endorsement of stereotypes on the basis of the employees＇ bebavior in service contacts.The 254 samples are test-ed by using 2×2 between experimental design approach,and the hypotyesis test is conducted by combining with the meth-od of variance analysis.The results show that entity theorists are easier than gradient theorists to form stereotype of service organizations by observing the behavior of the saff in service contacts.Furthermore,no maller what kind of behaviors hercaf-ter,the judgments of entity theorists are hard to change if the stereotype is formed.These results provide a new analysis per-speetive of serviee quality and consumer behavior for service industries,especially beneficial to those newly established in-dustries.

作者银成钺王影

机构地区东北师范大学商学院

出处《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 2014年第2期166-171,共6页 East China Economic Management

基金国家自然科学基金项目(71072159) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(12QN047)

关键词服务接触刻板印象内隐人格理论实体论渐变论 serviee contacls stereotype implicit personality theory entity theory gradient theory

分类号 F063.1 [经济管理—政治经济学]

作者简介银成钺（1974-），男，辽宁沈阳人，副教授，管理学博士，研究方向：服务营销，消费者行为；王影（1981-），女，黑龙江牡丹江人，讲师，经济学博士，研究方向：品牌管理，消费者行为

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献31

1Fiske S T. Social beings: A core motives approach to social psychology[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
2Ford T E, Stangor C. The role of diagnosticity in stereotype formation: Perceiving group means and variances [J]. Jour- nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992,63 (3) : 356- 367.
3Judd C M, Park B. Out-group homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and group levels [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988,54(5) : 778-788.
4Park B, Hastie R. Perception of variability in category devel- opment: Instance- versus abstraction-based stereotypes [Jl. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987,53(4): 621-635.
5Kunda Z, Sherman-Williams B. Stereotypes and the constru- al of individuating information [J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1993,19 ( 1 ) :90-99.
6Maerae C N, Bodenhausen G V, Milne A B. Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound[J]. Journal of Per- sonality and Social Psychology, 1995,67(5) :808-817.
7Bitner M J. Evaluating Service Encounters: The Effects of Physical Surroundings and Employee Responses[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1990,54 ( 1 ) :69-82.
8Zeithaml V A, Bitner M J. Service Marketing [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.
9Levy S, Stroessner S, Dweck C S. Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicittheories[J]. Journal of Per- sonality and Social Psychology, 1998,74(6) : 1421-1436.
10王沛,杨亚平.刻板印象信息表征的模式及其功能[J].心理学报,2007,39(6):1025-1033. 被引量：9

二级参考文献43

1[1]Dweck C S, Chiu Hong. Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reaction: a world from two perspectives, Psychological Inquiry, 1995, 6: 267～285
2[2]Levy S R , Plaks J E, Dweck C S. Modes of social thought: Implicit theories and social understanding. In: Chaiken S, Trope Y, ed. Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology. NY: Guilford Press, 1999. 179～202
3[3]Mueller C, Dweck C S. Praise for intelligence can undermine children's motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 75: 33～52
4[4]Shoda Y, Michel W. Cognitive social approach to dispositional inferences: What if the perceiver is a cognitive social theorist? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1993, 19: 574～585
5[5]Chiu Hong, Dweck C S. lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 73: 19～30
6[6]Levy S R., Dweck C S. trait vs. process-centered social judgment. Social cognition, 1998, 16: 151～172
7[7]Dweck C S. Self-theory: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Philadelphia, PA, US: Psychology Press, 1999
8[8]Dweck C S, Chiu, Hong. Implicit theories: elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry, 1995, 6: 322 ～333
9[9]Norenzayan A, Choi I, Nisbett R E. Eastern and Western perceptions of causality for social behavior: Lay theories about personalities and situations. In: Prentice D A, Miller D T ed. Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict. New York, NY, US: Russell Sage Foundation, 1999. 239～272
10[10]Nisbett R E, Peng C I, Norenzayan A. Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 2001, 108(2): 291～310