期刊文献+

贸易便利化视角下的知识产权边境执法——兼对《反假冒贸易协定》的评论 被引量:8

Border Enforcement of Intellectual Property under Trade Facilitation Perspective——Reviews on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 若干发达国家于2010年10月正式公布了此前一直秘密谈判的《反假冒贸易协定》,旨在进一步加强知识产权的执法体系。于此同时,随着关税壁垒的大幅削减以及各国对国际货物贸易增长的进一步需求,贸易便利化成为各级贸易规则谈判的重要议题。在这样的背景下,贸易便利化与知识产权边境执法之间的相互关系和相互影响问题日渐凸显。本文尝试从贸易便利化的视角来考察知识产权边境执法体系,在概述了《反假冒贸易协定》的边境执法规则后,进一步分析了这套规则对贸易便利化的影响。在此基础上,本文着重讨论了中国应如何在促进贸易便利化和保护知识产权的双向维度下确立恰当的知识产权边境执法体系,并提出了具体的建议。 To further strengthen the enforcement system of intellectual property rights, several developed countries officially announced the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement(ACTA) in October 2010 that had been secretly negotiated between them. At the same time, since tariff barriers have been greatly slashed and the demand for international trade of goods further grows up, trade facilitation gradually becomes an important issue at each level of trade rules negotiation. In this context, the interrelationship and mutual influence between trade facilitation and intellectual property border enforcement is increasingly prominent. This paper attempts to examine the intellectual property border enforcement system from the perspective of trade facilitation. After makes an overview of the border enforcement rules under ACTA, this paper further analyses the influence of this set of rules on trade facilitation. On this basis, this paper focuses on how to establish an appropriate intellectual property border enforcement system under the two-way dimension of promotion trade facilitation and protection of intellectual property, and puts forward concrete proposals.
作者 徐昕
出处 《世界贸易组织动态与研究(上海对外贸易学院学报)》 北大核心 2012年第5期31-37,共7页 Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics
基金 2011年度上海市教育委员会085工程项目(上海对外贸易学院国际贸易学科群建设 项目编号Z08511047)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 TRIPS协议 ACTA 贸易便利化 知识产权 边境执法 TRIPS Agreement ACTA trade facilitation intellectual property border measures
作者简介 徐昕:厦门大学国际法博士,上海对外贸易学院wTo研究教育学院副教授。研究方向:WTO争端解决机制、知识产权等。
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1杨鸿.《反假冒贸易协定》的知识产权执法规则研究[J].法商研究,2011,28(6):108-116. 被引量:26
  • 2WTO官方网[2012-04-20].http:/1www.wto.org/englishlnews_e/newsll-e/trip_240ctll_e.htm.
  • 3埃及、巴西、中国等国在2011年10月TRIPS协议理事会会上的发言,WTO官方网[2012-04-20].http://www.wtoorg/english/news_e/newsll-e/trip_240ctll_e.htm.
  • 4World Trade Organization 1999 dntemadonal Convention on the Harmonization and Simplih'cation of Customs Procedures (as amended),General Annex, Standard 6.2,Brussels,Known as the Revised Kyoto Convention.
  • 5Paragraph 21 of the Singapore Ministerial Declaration, adopted on 13 December,1996.
  • 6Article 51 of TRIPS Agreement; footnote 3 of Section 3-Border Measures,ACTA (EU lnterinstitutional File 2011/0166,Brussels,August 23,2011).
  • 7Article 31 of TRIPS Agreement; Article 16 of ACTA (EU Interinstitutional File 2011/0166,Brussels,August 23,2011).
  • 8Article 16 of ACTA (EU lnterinstitutional File 2011/0166,Brussels,August 23,2011).
  • 9Article 14 of ACTA (EU Interinstitutional File 2011/0166,Brussels,August 23,2011).
  • 10Article 17.1 of ACTA (EU Interinstitutional File 2011/0166,Brussels,August 23,2011).

二级参考文献55

共引文献54

同被引文献45

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部