期刊文献+

脉冲电泳核型分析在酿酒酵母菌分类学研究中的应用 被引量:6

RECLASSIFICATION OF SACCHAROMYCES STRAINS BY COMPARATIVE ELECTROPHORETIC KARYOTYPING
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据酵母属( Saccharomyces Meyen ex Reess) 分类学研究最新进展,核实并更新了保藏于中国普通微生物菌种保藏中心的该属菌株的种类归属。在形态和生理生化性状,包括对6 种糖的发酵能力、对18 种碳源和3 种氮源化合物的同化能力、在无维生素培养基中和37 ℃下的生长情况、对放线菌素酮的抗性等常规分类学研究的基础上,对部分疑难菌株进行了脉冲电泳核型比较分析。酿酒酵母( Saccharomycescerevisiae) 、贝酵母( S.bayanus) 和巴氏酵母( S.pastorianus) 三者与少孢酵母( S.exiguus) 在电泳核型上具有明显的差异,主要表现在前三者染色体DNA 分子的大小范围均为225 ~2200 kb ,而S.exiguus 缺少小于365 kb 的染色体DNA 分子。S.cerevisiae 的模式和权威菌株具有12 ~14 条染色体DNA 带;S.bayanus 和S.pastorianus 的模式菌株均有17 条带,但在带型上存在一定差异。原归于S.cerevisiae 的株菌AS2-100 具有16 条带,与S.cerevisiae 区别明显而与S.bayanus 相似;而原定名S. The strains of Saccharomyces Meyen ex Reess preserved in China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC) were recharacterized and reidentified according to recent taxonomic improvement of the genus. The strains AS 2 100(originally classified in S.cerevisiae) , AS 2 1158(from former USSR and originally classified in S.exiguus ) and AS 2 1555(from Australia and originally classified in S.uvarum )were found to be different from the standard descriptions of the species concerned in some physiological properties. Comparative CHEF electrophoretic karyotype analysis showed that the chromosomal DNA banding pattern of AS 2 100 was similar to that of the type strain of S.bayanus , while the electrophoretic karyotypes of AS 2 1158 and AS 2 1555 were similar to those of the type and authentic strains of S.cerevisiae. Therefore, AS 2 100 was reidentified as S.bayanus , and AS 2 1158 and AS 2 1555 were reclassified in the speices S.cerevisiae .
出处 《微生物学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2000年第1期9-13,共5页 Acta Microbiologica Sinica
关键词 酿酒酵母 脉冲电泳核型分析 分类学 Saccharomyces cerevisiae,Saccharomyces bayanus,Electrophoretic karyotype
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1[1]Schwartz D C, Cantor C R. Cell, 1984, 37:67~75.
  • 2[2]Carle G F, Olson M V. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1985, 82: 3756~3760.
  • 3[3]Boekhout T, Renting M, Scheffers W A, et al. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 1993,63:157~163.
  • 4[4]Dewar K, Bernier L, Levesque R C. Electrophoretic karyotyping in fungi. In Birren B, Lai E eds. Nonmammalian Genomic Analysis: A Practical Guide. San Diego: Academic Press, 1996.25~60
  • 5[5]Vaughan-Matini A, Martini A, Cardinali G. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 1993, 63:145~156.
  • 6[6]Cardinali G, Martini A. Iht J Syst Bacteriol, 1994, 44:791~797.
  • 7[7]NaumovGI, Naumova E S, KorholaM. SystApplMicrobiol, 1995,18 :103~108 .
  • 8[8]Vaughan-Martini A, Martini A. Syst Appl Microbiol, 1993, 16:113~119.
  • 9[9]Van der Walt J P, Yarrow D. Methods for isolation, maintenance, classification and identification of yeasts. In Kreger-van Rij N J W ed. The Yeasts, A Taxonomic Study, 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elservier Science Publishers B V,1984.45~104.
  • 10[10]Vanghan-Martini A, Martini A. Antonie van Leeuzoenhoek, 1987, 53:77~84.

同被引文献68

引证文献6

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部