期刊文献+

经椎弓根内固定手术治疗退行性腰椎侧凸合并椎管狭窄症 被引量:2

Pedicle internal fixation surgery for treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis with scoliosis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经腰椎后路矫形植骨内固定术治疗退行性腰椎侧凸合并椎管狭窄症(DLSS)的疗效。方法回顾性分析2008年6月至2012年6月本院收治19例退行性腰椎侧凸并椎管狭窄患者的临床资料。所有患者均采用腰椎后路减压、矫形固定、融合手术治疗。采用症状视觉模拟评估表(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数评分表(ODI)、腰椎冠状位Cobb角对患者治疗前和末次随访时神经功能恢复情况及矫正角度进行评价。结果全部病例获得随访,随访时间6~31个月,平均13个月。术前患者平均VAS评分(7.14±1.04)分,ODI评分(63.89±11.78)%,末次随访患者平均VAS评分(2.35±0.98)分(与术前比较,P<0.05),ODI评分(25.54±9.72)%(与术前比较,P<0.05),Cobb角由术前平均(24.32°±10.52°)矫正至术后平均(10.56°±7.12°),ODI改善优良率为73.68%。随访期间矫正角度无明显丢失及内固定断裂,植骨融合率100%。结论腰椎后路节段减压植骨内固定是一种治疗退行性腰椎侧凸合并椎管狭窄症的有效方法之一。 Objective To observe the effectiveness of pedicle internal fixation surgery in the treatment of the degenerative lumbar stenosis with scoliosis(DLSS). Methods The clinical data of 19 DLSS patients who were addmitied into our hospital from June 2008 to June 2012 were analysed retrospectively. All the patients were underwent lumbar spine posterior decompression, orthopaedics fixation, and fusion. Visual analog symptom rating scale(VAS) ,Oswestry disability index(ODI) and the lumbar coronal Cobb angle were used for efficacy assessment. Results All patients were followed up for 6 - 31 months, at the mean time of 13 months. The mean preoperative VAS was (7.14 ± 1.04) point, ODI was (63.89 ± 11.78) % , Cobb angle was (24.32° ± 10.52° ). The mean VAS of the last follow-up was (2.35 ± 0.98) point, ODI was (25.54 ± 9.72) %. Compared with the preoperative scores, it is of obvious difference(P 〈 0.05 ). The Cobb angle was ( 10.56° ± 7.12° ) at the last follow-up, the differenee was significant compared with the preoperative Cobb angle of ( 24.32° ± 10.52° ). There was no obvious corrective angle loss and no internal fixation failure occurred during the follow-up, and the rate of fusion for bone graft was 100%. Conclusion Pediele internal fixation surgery is an effeetive treatment for degenerative lumbar stenosis with scoliosis.
作者 官建
出处 《局解手术学杂志》 2013年第3期272-274,共3页 Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery
关键词 退行性腰椎侧凸 椎管狭窄 脊柱融合 degenerative lumbar scoliosis spinal stenosis spinal fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Gupta MC. Degenerative scoliosis. Options for surgical management [ J ]. Orthop Clin North Am,2003,34 ( 2 ) :269 - 279.
  • 2Robin GC. Scoliosis in the elderly: idiopathic or osteoporotic? [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1986, ( 205 ) : 311 - 312.
  • 3Liu H, Ishihara H, Kanamori M, et al. Characteristics of nerve root com- pression caused by degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with scoliosis [ J ]. Spine J,2003,3 (6) :524 - 529.
  • 4李放.退行性腰椎管狭窄症的病理基础与阶梯治疗[J].华北国防医药,2008,20(5):19-22. 被引量:8
  • 5张志成,任大江,孙天胜,李放,关凯,赵广民,单建林.退变性腰椎侧凸合并椎管狭窄的阶梯性治疗策略[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2011,25(8):951-955. 被引量:25
  • 6Transfeldt EE,Topp R, Mehbod AA, et al. Surgical outcomes of decom- pression, decompression with limited fusion, and decompression with full curve fusion for degenerative scoliosis with radiculopathy [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976) ,2010,35 (20) : 1872 - 1875.
  • 7Reinker K, Simmons JW, Patil V, et al. Can VEPTR control progression of early-onset kyphoscoliosis? A cohort study of VEPTR patients with severe kyphoscoliosis [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011,469 ( 5 ) : 1342 - 1348.
  • 8Frazier DD, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, et al. Associations between spinal de- formity and outcomes after decompression for spinal stenosis [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 1997,22 ( 17 ) :2025 - 2029.
  • 9Simmons ED. Surgical treatment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with associated scoliosis[ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2001, (384) :45 - 53.
  • 10Kwon BK,Elgafy H, Keynan O, et al. Progressive junctional kyphosis at the caudal end of lumbar instrumented fusion : etiology, predictors, and treatment[J]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976) ,2006,31 ( 17 ) :1943 - 1951.

二级参考文献49

  • 1刘瑾,刘新成.老年人髋部骨折危险性评估与早期并发症的关系[J].实用骨科杂志,2005,11(1):66-67. 被引量:12
  • 2刘锦波,徐小峰,沈铁城,袁盛茂.老年人髋部骨折手术耐受性的探讨(附186例临床分析)[J].镇江医学院学报,1995,5(2):88-89. 被引量:2
  • 3Silva FE, Lenke LG. Adult degenerative scoliosis: evaluation and man- agement. Neurosurg Focus, 2010, 28(3): E1.
  • 4Crawford CH 3rd, Glassman SD. Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis associated with adult scoliosis. Instr Course Lect, 2009, 58: 669-676.
  • 5de Vries AA, Mullender MG, Pluymakers WI, et al. Spinal decom- pensation in degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J, 2010, 19(9): 1540-1544.
  • 6Oskouian RJ Jr, Shaffrey CI. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Neurosurg Clin N Am, 2006, 17(3): 299-315.
  • 7Transfeldt EE, Topp R, Mehbod AA, et al. Surgical outcomes of de- compression, decompression with limited fusion, and decompression with full curve fusion for degenerative scoliosis with radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35(20): 1872-1875.
  • 8McLaughlin MA, Orosz GM, Maqaziner J, et al. Preoperative status and risk of complications in patients with hip fracture. J Gen Intern Med, 2006, 21(3): 219-225.
  • 9Chin KR, Furey C, Bohlman HH. Risk of progression in de novo low- magnitude degenerative lumbar curves: natural history and literature review. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 2009, 38(8): 404-409.
  • 10Ploumis A, Transfledt EE, Denis F. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis as- sociated with spinal stenosis. Spine J, 2007, 7(4): 428-436.

共引文献28

同被引文献17

  • 1刘洋,石永常,林欣.后路减压内固定治疗腰椎管狭窄57例远期疗效观察[J].实用医院临床杂志,2010,7(4):140-142. 被引量:9
  • 2Maruta T, Otao G, Miyazato T, et al. Effects of intravenous low-dose recombinant human atrial natriuretic peptide on renal function in the perioperative management for gas- trointestinal perforation or ileus: a retrospective single- center study [J]. J Crit Care,2013,28(2): 133-140.
  • 3Azimi P,Rezaei O,Montazeri A. An outeome measure of functionality and guality of cife in patients with cerrical myelo path [J]. Iran Red Cresent Med J,2014,16(6) :e$102.
  • 4Danesh A, Janghorbani M,Khalatbari S. Effects of antena- tal corticosteroids on maternal serum indicators of infec-tion in women at risk for preterm delivery: A randomized trial comparing betamethasone and dexamethasone [J]. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences:the Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences,2012, 17(10) :911-917.
  • 5Cheng T,Zhang G,Zhang X. Review: minimally invasive versus conventional dynamic hip screw fixation in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures:a systematic re- view and meta-analysis [J]. Surg Innov,2011,18(2) :99-105.
  • 6Fitzpatrick DC,Sheerin DV, Wolf BR, et al. A random- ized,prospective study comparing intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation with the dynamic hip screw and the dy- namic helical hip system in a community practice [J]. Iowa Orthop J, 2011,31 : 166-172.
  • 7Malley NT, Deeb AP, Bingham KW, et al. Outcome of the dynamic helical hip screw system for intertrochanteric hip fractures in the elderly patients [J]. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil, 2012,3 (2) : 68-73.
  • 8VanNess PH,Peduzzi PN,Quagliarello VJ. Efficacy and effectiveness as aspects of cluster randomized trials with nursing home residents:methodological insights from a pneumonia prevention trial [J]. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 2012,33 (6) : 2320-2324.
  • 9尚保生,程延,朱养均,常瑞,崔贵荣,何鹏,阴小龙.全椎板减压植骨钉棒固定治疗腰椎管狭窄症[J].实用骨科杂志,2010,16(3):164-166. 被引量:5
  • 10张劲松,杨述华,许伟华,叶树楠.减压结合Dynesys动态稳定治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2010,18(11):881-883. 被引量:18

引证文献2

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部