摘要
目的 对腕管综合征在内窥镜视下手术与常规手术的疗效进行比较。方法 内窥镜组 40例 44腕 ,常规手术组 40例 44腕。术前按滨田分类方法分为 3类。两组分别在术后 1个月、3个月、12个月进行随访。根据Kelly功能评定标准对各型进行功能评价。结果 内窥镜组各型患者术后 1个月时 ,功能恢复速度稍慢于常规手术组 ,3个月后两组功能则完全相同。结论 两组的手术入路不同 ,但术后 3个月时的疗效却相同。但内窥镜组具有皮肤切口小 ,组织创伤轻 ,用局部麻醉 ,不须使用驱血带 ,术后不需石膏外固定等优点。
Objective To compare the treatment outcome between Okutsu method and routine surgical procedure for carpal tunnel release. Methods Endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) was done in 44 sides of 40 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Another 44 sides of 40 patients were treated by open carpal tunnel release (OCTR). The patients were divided into three types according to Hamada's classification before the operation. The patients were followed at 1 month, 3 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Functional assessment was made according to the criteria described by Kelly. Results Functional recovery of the ECTR group was slightly slower than that of the OCTR group 1 month after the operation. Three months postoperatively however, the functional results of the two groups were the same. Conclusions Though the operation approach of ECTR is different from that of OCTR, the result is similar. Compared with OCTR, ECTR has the following advantages: smaller incision and less tissue damage, local anaesthesia, and no tourniquet needed, and no postoperative immobilization.
出处
《中华手外科杂志》
CSCD
2000年第3期152-155,共4页
Chinese Journal of Hand Surgery
关键词
腕管综合征
内窥镜检查
治疗
Carpal tunnel syndrome
Endoscopy
Treatment outcome
