期刊文献+

右丙亚胺对接受含蒽环类药物化疗乳腺癌患者的心脏保护作用 被引量:30

Protective effect of dexrazoxane on cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients who received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨右丙亚胺(DEX)对乳腺癌患者接受含蒽环类药物化疗时的心脏保护作用。方法选取122例乳腺癌术后患者,随机分为实验组和对照组。实验组61例,在接受含蒽环类药物化疗方案的同时,采用DEX治疗;对照组61例,患者仅采用含蒽环类药物化疗方案。所有患者化疗4个周期,分别监测化疗前后患者的心脏功能状态和血液学变化,观察化疗的非心脏及血液学毒性反应。结果对照组患者化疗前后B型脑利钠肽(BNP)分别为(106.78±4.52)×10^-6μg/ml和(187.19±8.71)×10^-6μg/ml,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);实验组患者化疗前后BNP分别为(102.34±8.76)×10^-6μg/ml和(105.29±7.21)×10^-6μg/ml,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。对照组患者化疗前后心肌肌钙蛋白T(cTnT)分别为(12.55±2.73)×10^-6μg/ml和(31.05±7.10)×10^-6μg/ml,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);实验组患者化疗前后cTnT分别为(12.704-2.15)×10^-3μg/ml和(13.22±7.82)×10^-3μg/ml,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。对照组患者化疗前后心率分别为(75.32±7.14)次/min和(89.60±9.21)次/min,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);实验组患者化疗前后心率分别为(78.60±6.29)次/min和(83.10±7.56)次/min,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);对照组患者化疗前后左室射血分数(LVEF)分别为(65.23±7.82)%和(55.21±7.23)%,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);实验组化疗前后LVEF分别为(64.12±6.25)%和(59.36±4.72)%,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。对照组患者化疗前后中性粒细胞(ANC)计数分别为(3.95±1.36)×10^9/L和(3.50±1.52)X10。/L,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.c15);实验组化疗前后ANC计数分别为(4.96±1.41)×10^9/L和(3.10±1.26)×10^9/L,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。两组患者非心脏及血液学毒性反应的差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。实验组I-Ⅳ度骨髓抑制发生率分别为21.3%、16.4%、24.6%和4.9%。对照组I~Ⅳ度骨髓抑制发生率分别为16.4%、11.5%、9.8%和5.5%,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论DEX在不增加乳腺癌患者非心脏及血液学毒性的前提下,可明显降低蒽环类药物化疗患者的心脏毒性。DEX联合蒽环类药物增加了乳腺癌患者骨髓抑制的发生风险,在联合使用时应密切监测患者血象或给予常规骨髓支持。 Objective To evaluate the cardioprotective effects of dexrazoxane (DEX) on breast cancer patients who received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. Methods A total of 122 breast cancer patients after operation were randomly divided into two groups: The experimental group of 61 cases treated with EPI plus DEX ( DEX: EPI = 10:1 ) as adjuvant chemotherapy regimen, and the control group of 61 cases treated with EPI but without DEX. All patients received four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy and their changes of specific cardiac functional status and hematology status before and after chemotherapy, as well as non-cardiac toxicity were observed and analyzed. Results Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) before chemotherapy and after four cycles of chemotherapy in the control group was ( 106.78 ±4.52) ×10^-6μg/ml and (187.19 ± 8.71 ) ×10^-3μg/ml, respectively, with a significant difference between them (P 〈 0.05 ). It in the experimental group was ( 102.34 ± 8.76) ×10^-6μg/ml and ( 105.29 -± 7.21 )×10^-3μg/ml, respectively, without a significant difference (P 〉 0.05 ). Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) before chemotherapy and after four cycles of chemotherapy in the control group was ( 12.55 ±2.73) ×10^-3μg/ml and ( 31.05± 7.10 ) ×10^-3μg/ml, respectively, with a significant difference between them (P 〈0.05). It in the experimental group was ( 12.70 ± 2.15) ×10^-3μg/ml and ( 13.65 ± 7.82) ×10^-3μg/ml, respectively, without a significant difference (P 〉 0.05). The hart rate (HR) before chemotherapy and after four cycles of chemotherapy in the control group, was 75.32 ±7.14 bpm and 89.60 ± 9.21 bpm, respectively, with a significant difference (P 〈0.05). It in the experimental group was 78.60±6.29 bpm and 83.10±7.56 bpm, respectively, without a significant difference (P 〉 0. 05 ). The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) before chemotherapy and after four cycles of chemotherapy in the control group was (65.23± 7.82) % and (55.21 ± 7.23 ) %, respectively, with a significant difference between them ( P 〈 0.05 ). It in the experimental group was ( 64.12 ± 6.25 ) % and ( 59.6 ± 4.72 ) %, respectively, without a significant difference (P 〉 0. 05 ). The absolute neutrophil count before chemotherapy and after four cycles of chemotherapy in the control group was (3.95± 1.36 ) ×10^-9/L and ( 3.50 ± 1.52 ) ×10^-9/L, respectively, without a significant difference ( P 〉 0.05 ). It in the experimental group, was (4.96± 1.41 ) ×10^-9/L and (3.10 ± 1.26) ×10^-9/L, respectively, with a significant difference (P 〈0.05). The incidence of grade I - 1V bone marrow suppression in the experimental group was 21. 3%, 16.4%, 24. 6%, and 4. 9%, respectively. It in the control group was 16.4%, 11.5%, 9. 8%, and 5. 5%, respectively, with a significant difference (P 〈 0.05). Conclusions Cardiac toxicity after anthracycline treatment in breast cancer patients may be significantly reduced by DEX, without increase of non-cardiac and and non- hematologic toxicity. DEX combined with anthracycline increases the risk of bone marrow suppression, therefore, peripheral blood picture should be monitored or routine bone marrow support may be needed.
出处 《中华肿瘤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期135-139,共5页 Chinese Journal of Oncology
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 蒽环类 右丙亚胺 治疗结果 毒性 副作用 Breast neoplasms Anthracyclines Dexrazoxane Treatment outcome Toxicity Side effects
作者简介 通信作者:张瑾,Email:davidz9132002@yahoo.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1徐兵河,赵龙妹,王佳玉,袁芃.泰索帝联合顺铂治疗31例蒽环类耐药性晚期乳腺癌疗效分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(6):471-473. 被引量:46
  • 2Jemal A,Siegel R,Ward E. Cancer statistics,2008[J].CA:A Cancer Journal for Clinicians,2008.71-96.
  • 3Barry E,Alvarez JA,Scully RE. Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicty:course,pathophysiology,prevention and management[J].Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy,2007.1039-1058.
  • 4Lipshultz SE,Alvarez JA,Scully RE. Anthracycline associated cardiotoxicity in survivors of childhood cancer[J].Heart,2008.525-533.
  • 5Marty M,Espié M,Llombart A. Multicenter randomized phase Ⅲ study of the cardioprotective effect of dexrazoxane (Cardioxane) in advanced/metastatic breast cancer patients treated with anthracycline based chemotherapy[J].Annals of Oncology,2006.614-622.
  • 6van Dalen EC,Caron HN,Dickinson HO. Cardioprotective interventions for cancer patients receiving anthracyclines[J].Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,2011.CD003917.
  • 7Mwale F,Ciobanu I,Demers CN. Amifostine and dexrazoxane enhance the rapid loss of bone mass and further deterioration of vertebrae architecture in female rats[J].Calcified Tissue International,2005.175-179.
  • 8Khasraw M,Bell R,Dang C. Epirubicin:is it like doxombicin in breast cancer. A clinical review[J].Breast,2012.142-149.
  • 9Montaigne D,Hurt C,Neviere R. Mitochondria death/survival signaling pathways in cardiotoxicity induced by anthracyclines and anticancer-targeted therapies[J].Biochem Res Int,2012.951539.
  • 10江泽飞,宋三泰.蒽环类化疗药物治疗乳腺癌的新动向[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(4):193-195. 被引量:27

二级参考文献9

共引文献71

同被引文献312

引证文献30

二级引证文献140

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部