期刊文献+

学院科学家角色的新分化 被引量:4

The Differentiation of Academic Scientists
原文传递
导出
摘要 社会需求、学科发展和个人动机等多种因素,促使科学家的传统角色产生了分化。走出"象牙塔"的科学家,开始演变为"企业家式的"科学家并成为"双栖"科学家。和其他科学家相比较,这些科学家发表了更多的科研论文、创造了更多的经济价值、赢得了更多的声望。但同时,这些处于利益冲突之中的科学家,很有可能生产可疑的知识并对科学事业造成危害。 The traditional role of scientists was differentiated by the forces such as social need, disciplinary development, and personal motiva- tions. The academic scientists stepped out of the ivory tower and became entrepreneurial scientists and bi-scientists. Compared with other scien- tists, they published more peer-reviewed articles, brought about more economic profit, and reaped more reputation. Nevertheless, entrepre- neurial scientists produce unreliable knowledge and undermine scientific enterprise due to their conflicts of interest.
作者 文剑英
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第12期46-50,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 江苏省教育厅哲学社会科学项目"科技与社会互动视域下的利益冲突"(2011SJB720003) 江苏大学重点项目(2011JDZD022)
关键词 角色 企业家式的科学家 利益冲突 Role Entrepreneurial scientist Conflicts of interest
作者简介 文剑英(1971-),河南开封人,哲学博士,江苏大学马克思主义学院副教授,美国亚利桑那州立大学访问学者,主要研究方向:科学、技术与社会。
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Steven Shapin. The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation [M]. Chicago.. The University of Chicago Press, 2008.
  • 2Joseph Agassi. The Manhattan Project and Its Longs Shad- ow [J]. Philosophy of the Social Science, 2011, 41 (4): 574-595.
  • 3Jerome Doutriaux; Tim Padmore; Hans Schuetze. Theory and Practice in University-Industry Collaborations: An In- ternational Case study [DB/OL]. At http://www, chet. educ. ubc. ca/pdf_files/HansTheoryPractice, pdf.
  • 4Henry Etzkowitz. The Norms of Entreprenrurial Seience: Cognitive Effects of the New University-industry Linkages [J]. Research Policy, 1998(27) : 822-833.
  • 5Sheldon Krimsky. Academic-Corporate Ties in Biotechnolo- gy: A Quantitative Study [J]. Science, Technology, & Human Value, 1991, 16(3): 275-287.
  • 6Jamie Weatherston, Academic Entrepreneurs: Is A Spin-offCompany Too Risky [DB/OL]. At www. sbaer, uca. edu/ Research/iesb/1995/pdf/20. pdf.
  • 7David Blumenthal. Growing pains for saew academic/indus- try relationships [J]. Health Affairs (Millwood), 1994, 13 (3):176-193.
  • 8David Blumenthal; Eric Campbell; N. Causino, et al. Par- ticipation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry [J].The New England Journal of Medicine, 1996, 335(23) : 1734-1739.
  • 9Richard Davidson. Source of funding and outcome of clinical trials[J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1986, 1: 155-158.
  • 10Mark Frieberg; B. Saffran; T. Stinson, et al. Evaluation of conflict of interest in economic analyses of new drugs used in oncology[J]. Journal of the American Medical Association,1999, 282(15) : 1453-1457.

同被引文献28

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部