FDI、“资本深化”与工业污染排放实证研究——基于中国省级面板数据的分析被引量：3

FDI,Capital Deepening and Pollution Emissions——Based on 1997-2010 Provincial Panel Data Analysis

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要文章基于1997-2010年省级层面的数据测算出中国的环境技术效率并在此基础上探讨FDI与工业污染排放的内在关系。研究发现FDI、资本禀赋、国有产值比重、环境技术效率等变量对于我国的工业污染排放均有显著的影响作用。实证结果验证了"环境避难所"假说;FDI流入不仅直接带来大量的"三废"污染排放,而且通过关联效应驱动我国产业结构不断工业化和"资本深化",间接导致污染排放增加;资本禀赋、国有产值居高不下均强化了污染排放,环境技术效率显著弱化了污染排放。 Based on the provincial industrial statistics panel data from 1997 to 2010, this paper uses DEA for calculating the technical efficiency of Chinese environment and investigating the inherent relations of FD1 and the industrial pollution emissions. The empirical results show that： FDI, capital endowment, the proportions of government-owned output in the national economy and the technical efficiency of environment have remarkable＇ influences on the pollution emissions of industries of China. The empirical results verify the pollution havens hypothesis. Not on!y FDI inflow brings about a bad result （enormous pollution emissions） , but also drives industrialization and capital deepening of China through relevance effect, indirect leading to the increase of pollution emissions. Both capital endowment and the rising proportions of government-owned output in the national economy promote the whole industrial pollution emissions. However, the technical efficiency of environment notably reduces it.

作者孟源郑义

机构地区对外经济贸易大学商学院东南大学经济管理学院

出处《商业经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第9期88-96,共9页 Journal of Business Economics

基金国家社会科学基金项目(11CJL065) 教育部人文社会科学基金青年项目(10YJC790169)

关键词 FDI 资本深化环境技术效率污染排放 FDI capital deepening technical efficiency of environment pollution emissions

分类号 F832.6 [经济管理—金融学]

作者简介盂源（1980-），男，安徽泗县人，对外经济贸易大学商学院副教授，博士研究生，研究方向为国际贸易；郑义（1974-），男，汉族，安徽蒙城人，东南大学经济管理学院讲师，博士研究生，研究方向为能源经济、环境保护与经济发展。

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献33

1COPELAND B R,TAYLOR M S. North-South Trade and the Environment[ J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994,109 (3) : 755 -787.
2BRANDER J A, TAYLOR M S. International Trade between Consumer and Conservationist Countries [ J ]. Resource Energy Economics, 1997,19(4) :267-298.
3MANI M, WHEELER D. In Search of Pollution Havens? Dirty Industry Migration in the World Economy [ J ]. Journal of Environmental and Development, 1998,7 ( 3 ) :215-247.
4PETHIG, RUDIGER. Pollution, Welfare, and Environmental Policy in the Theory of Comparative Advantage [ J]. Journal ofEnvironmental Economics and Management, 1976,2 ( 2 ) : 160-169.
5SIEBERT H. Environmental Quality and the Gains from Trade [ J ]. Kyklos, 1977,30 (4) :657-673.
6LOPEZ,RAMON. The Environment as a Factor of Produetion: The Effects of Economie Growth and Trade Liberalization [ J ]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1994,27 ( 2 ) : 163-184.
7ESKELAND G S, HARRISON A E. Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis[ J]. Journal of Development Economies ,2003,70( 1 ) :1-23.
8BIRDSALL N,WHEELER D. Trade Policy and Industrial Pollution in Latin America: Where Are the Pollution Havens? [ J]. Journal of Environmental and Development, 1993,2( 1 ) : 137-149.
9FRANKEL J,ROSE A. Is Trade Good or Bad for the Environment? Sorting out the Causality [ J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2005,87 ( 1 ) : 85-91.
10ZARSKY L. Havens, Halos, Spaghetti:Untangling the Evidence about Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment [ R ]. Hague:OECD Conference on Foreign Direct Investment and The Environment,1999.