摘要
扒窃入刑的必要性主要在于其扒窃行为的特殊危害性,"扒窃入刑"客观上无数额、次数、手段的限制,突破了盗窃罪以数额定罪的观念,但主观上应是基于窃取较大公私财物的故意,应从这两个方面把握扒窃的入罪标准。扒窃的既遂标准与一般的盗窃差异不大,但扒窃入刑使得扒窃未遂也受处罚。总之,《刑法修正案(八)》关于扒窃的规定,确实在一定程度上打破了司法实践中打击扒窃的困境。
The reason of writing pick-pocketing c,＇ime into criminal law is mainly because of its special hazards. Pick- pocketing crime break through the ideas that larceny conviction is usually based on the amount of money involved, and we should understand the standards of pick-pocketing crime from the two following aspects： objectively, there is not limits as to the amount of money, the times and the means of stealing; subjectively, there must have a purpose to steal larger public or private property. The standard of accomplishment of the pick-pocketing crime and general la~,ceny is similar, the difference is that thence are penalty for theft even though the pick-pocketing crime is not accomplished. In short, the provisions about pick-pocketing crime in ＂Criminal Law Amendment （ eight）＂ did break the dilemma in the judicial practice against pickpockets.
出处
《湖南警察学院学报》
2012年第2期99-104,共6页
Journal of Hunan Police Academy
关键词
扒窃
扒窃入刑
公共场所
随身携带
pick-pocketing
pick-pocketing crime
public place
portable
作者简介
李竞芬（1987-），女，湖南宁乡人，中国政法大学刑事司法学院刑法学专业2010级硕士研究生，主要从事中国刑法研究。
