期刊文献+

“真”是否有本质——基于真理符合论与紧缩论的比较 被引量:1

The Debate of Whether Truth has a Nuture——comparing the correspondence theory of truth with deflationism
原文传递
导出
摘要 传统意义上的真之符合论把"真"理解为思想与世界的关系,强调"真"的属性与作用;真之紧缩论则以真的透明性为直觉,涵盖了包括弗雷格紧缩思想、冗余论、代语句理论和极小主义理论在内的几种理论,这些理论的核心思想认为真谓词仅仅起着逻辑句法作用,它的出现不能给语句增添任何实体属性。于是,"真是否有本质"成为符合论与紧缩论争论的焦点,这一争论也成为区分不同真之理论的新标准。 As the representative of the robust theories of truth,Correspondence theory of truth focus on the substance and effect of the term "is true".But all deflationists don't agree this opinions.Deflationists think that the term "is true" doesn't add any physical property to the statement and it comes from people's intuitive understanding: When we consider the sentence "rose is red is true",we seem to consider the sentence "rose is red" through the term "is true",which is from the determine intuition of "is true".This paper will demonstrate the view on the base of several classical deflationisms.First,we consider Frege's thought as the initial of deflationism;second,Ramsey's redundancy;third,prosentential theory of truth;finally,the most representative of deflationism is Horwich's minimal theory,because Horwich would argue that the term "is true" can not attribute some property to object.In a word,"true" has not a nature of physical property,but only has a logical property,the term "is true" exists for some logical need.Through the two comparisons,we will recognize that the focus of deflationism is the term "is true" in the field of language,but robust theories of truth focus on the substance and effect of the term "is true",which belong to the field of metaphysics.According to "whether truth has a nature",the theory of truth can be classified into two categories: robust theories of truth and deflationism.
作者 彭媚娟
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期7-11,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 2010年度教育部青年基金项目"逻辑视野中的当代真理论研究--基于真之紧缩论的分析"(10YJC72040002)
关键词 本质 符合论 紧缩论 Truth Nature Correspondence Theory of Truth Deflationism
作者简介 作者简介:彭媚娟(1982-),女,江西永新人,博士,广东工业大学文法学院讲师,主要研究方向:哲学逻辑、逻辑哲学。
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Blackburn,S.Truth:A Guide[]..1984
  • 2Ramsey,F.P.Facts and Propositions[].PhilosophicalPapers.1990
  • 3Horwich,Paul.Meaning[]..1998
  • 4Horwich,Paul.Truth[]..1995
  • 5Michael P Lynch.Introduction:The Mystery of TruthThe Nature of Truth[]..2001
  • 6Dorothy L. Grover.A prosentential theory of truth[]..1992
  • 7Mark Eli Kalderon."The Transparency of Truth"[].Mind.1997
  • 8Horwich.Truth[]..1990

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部