摘要
《丁登寺》这首诗在了解华兹华斯早期的思想特别是宗教观上扮演了重要的角色。20世纪以来,国外的评论家从多种角度对此诗进行不同的解读;而国内的批评几乎都局限于从泛神论或自然主义的角度解读此诗,忽略了超泛神论和活力论这两个重要的解读角度。超泛神论解读是对泛神论解读的延伸,而活力论解读则是对泛神论和超泛神论解读的颠覆。通过分析和对比这三种解读,可以获得对《丁登寺》更深入的理解。
Tintern Abbey, which plays an important role in understanding Wordsworth＇s early thought, especially his religious ideas, has been interpreted from different perspectives by Western critics since the 20th century. In contrast, Chinese critics are almost limited to interpreting this poem from the pantheistic or naturalistic perspective, overlooking panentheism and the vital principle in the poem. Panentheistic interpretation is an extension of pantheistic interpretation; vitalistic interpretation is a subversion of both pantheistic interpretation and panentheistic interpretation. By analyzing and comparing these three different interpretations, we can have a better grasp of Tintern Abbey.
出处
《唐山学院学报》
2011年第6期68-71,85,共5页
Journal of Tangshan University
作者简介
郏鸿升（1978-），男，助教，硕士，主要从事现当代西方文论研究。
