师范生职业认同感的效能-价值双维核心模型的构建被引量：75

Professional Value and Professional Efficacy:The Dual Core Factor Model of Professional Identity in Normal Students

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要以师范生职业认同感研究的"职业能力"和"职业价值"两大取向为基础,根据其单维评估的不足,将职业效能感和职业价值感指标联合,提出师范生职业认同感的效能—价值双维核心模型,并考察该模型在3所部属师范大学的1237名免费师范生中是否存在及其效用。研究表明:(1)模型能有效将免费师范生分组,其中低效能—低价值占31.69%、低效能—高价值占6.63%、高效能—低价值占40.01%、高效能—高价值仅占21.67%,克服了单维评估存在的高估或低估问题;(2)模型在职业认同结果(职业意志感、职业意愿与期望感)、学业满意度、总体生活满意度及未来担忧上的分组效应显著,同时拥有高职业效能感和高职业价值感的免费师范生具有最佳的职业认同感、学业满意度、总体生活满意度和最少的未来担忧。 Extant studies on professional identity of normal students either focus on ＂professional efficacy＂ or ＂professional value＂,such single dimensional perspective is prone to overestimation or underestimation.Based on both perspectives,the present study put forward the dual core factor model,and tested it by investigating professional identity of 1237 tuition-free normal college students from three normal universities in China.Results show that：1） four groups were identified based on the survey：31.69% of students are low efficacy-low value,6.63% are low efficacy-high value,40.01% are high efficacy-low value,and 21.67% are high efficacy-high value,and the result is better than single dimensional assessment;2） the four groups differed significantly in terms of professional identity outcomes（involve professional volition and professional expectation）,academic satisfaction,life satisfaction,and the worry about the future.Results also show that,among these tuition-free normal college students,those with high professional efficacy and high professional value have best professional identity,academic satisfaction,general life satisfaction,and least worry about the future.

作者王鑫强张大均曾丽红

机构地区西南大学心理健康教育研究中心、教育科学研究所武夷学院人文与教师教育学院

出处《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期662-669,共8页 Psychological Development and Education

基金国家哲学社会科学基金(教育学)项目(BBA070014) 教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(西部)(10XJCXLX001)

关键词免费师范生教师职业认同感职业意志学业满意度心理健康 tuition-free normal college students teachers＇ professional identity professional volition academic satisfaction mental health

分类号 G443 [哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]

作者简介通讯作者：张大均，E—mail：zhangdj@swu．edu．cn

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献31

1Cochran-Smith , M. (2000). The questions that drive reform. Journal ofTeacher Education, 51, 331 -333.
2Gross,L. A. , Fitts, S. , Goodson-Espy,T. , & C|ark,A. (2010). Self as Teacher: Preliminary Role Identification of the Potential Teaching Candidate. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 3.5(2) , 1 -19.
3Hong, J.Y. (2010). Pre-service and beginning teachers' professional identity and its relation to dropping out of the profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1530 - 1543.
4Huizen, P. V. , Oers, B. V. , & Wubbels, T. (2005). A Vygotskian perspective on teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37 (3), 269 -290.
5Joseph,D. , & Heading, M. (2010). Putting Theory into Practice: Moving from Student Identity to Teacher Identity. Australian Journal of Teacher Education,35 ( 3 ) ,75 - 87.
6Korthagen, F. A.J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher : towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Edacation,20 ( 1 ) ,77 - 97.
7Korthagen, F., & Vasalos, A. (2005). Levels in reflection: core reflection as a means to enhance professional growth. Teachers and Teachin : Theocr and Practice. 11 ( 1 ) ,47 - 71.
8Luehmann, A. L. (2008). Using Blogging in Support of Teacher Professional Identity Development: A Case Study. The journal of the learning sciences, 17, 287 - 337.
9Malderez, A., Hobson, A., Traeey, L., & Kerr, K. (2007). Becoming a student teacher: core features of the experience. European Journal of Teacher Education, 30 ( 3 ), 225 - 248.
10McNay, M. , & Graham, R. (2007). Can Cooperating Teachers Help Student Teachers Develop a Vision of Education? The Teacher Educator, 42(3) , 224 -237.