摘要
《物权法》对抵押权实现做出了不同于《担保法》的规定。该法第195条第2款直接规定了抵押权人在达不成实现方式协议时,可以请求法院拍卖变卖抵押物。但这个创新性的民事实体法条文,究竟该适用我国民诉法中何种程序,目前还处于争议状态。从民诉法理论分析和比较法角度看,抵押权实现应当适用民事非讼程序,而非讼程序的制度构建正是文章的重点。
Different stipulations are made in Property Law and Guarantee Law when it comes to the means of realizing the mortgage right in China.Section 2 of article 195 of Property Law stipulates that ： where no agreement on the means of realizing the mortgage right is achieved,the mortgagee may require the people＇s court to auction or sell off the mortgaged property.However,which procedure of the procedural law should be used to put this innovative article of civil substantive law into application is still in dispute at present.With theoretical analysis and comparision,the present author reckons that civil noncontentious procedure should be applied to realizing the mortgage right,and the concrete system of this noncontentious procedure is also brought out in this paper.
出处
《北京科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2011年第1期50-54,72,共6页
Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
肖建国教授主持的国家社会科学基金项目"不动产强制执行程序研究"(10BFX051)的阶段性成果
关键词
民事诉讼
抵押权实现
非讼程序
civil procedure
realizing the mortgage right
noncontentious procedure
作者简介
肖建国（1969-）,男，河南人。中国人民大学法学院教授，法学博士。
陈文涛（1989-），男，河南人。中国人民大学法学院诉讼法学硕士研究生。
