期刊文献+

解决尼罗河水争端的国际法思考 被引量:5

Settlement of the Nile Water Disputes:Reflections from the International Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 尼罗河水争端由来已久,沿岸各国立场迥异。随着尼罗河沿岸各国人口的不断增长、经济的发展以及连年的干旱,尼罗河水争端日趋激烈。特别是2010年肯尼亚等五国签署重新分配尼罗河水份额的协议,更引起了主张维护其"历史权利"的埃及和苏丹的强烈不满,引发了新一轮的争端。尼罗河水争端的解决有赖于沿岸各国进行直接的协商谈判,各国都应作出一定的妥协,在遵循国际水法基本原则的基础上,追求共同订立全面、公正合理且兼顾各方利益的多边协议;并最终通过建立区域合作机制来解决争端。 There are long-standing water disputes among riparian countries of the Nile River,and the standpoints of all these countries are rather different.With the development of the economy,the continuous growth of the population,and years' droughts,all riparian countries increased water demands,which further intensified water disputes.In May 2010,a new round of disputes arose after five riparian countries,including Kenya,signed the Nile River Cooperative Framework Agreement intending to redistribute the share of the Nile water.This caused strong dissatisfaction from Egypt and Sudan who claimed to maintain their 'history right'.The settlement of water disputes relies on direct negotiations among all riparian countries.During the negotiations,all countries should:firstly,make some concessions and do their utmost to reach a multilateral agreement based on basic principles of international water law,and the agreement should be comprehensive,fair,reasonable and can balance interests of all riparian countries;secondly,establish a regional cooperation mechanism to find final solutions to the disputes.
作者 洪永红 刘婷
出处 《西亚非洲》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期12-18,共7页 West Asia and Africa
基金 国家社科基金课题《中非法律合作的历史与发展》(07BFX013) 对外经济贸易大学211三期项目(73400054)的阶段性成果
作者简介 洪永红,湘潭大学非洲法律与社会研究中心主任、教授、博士生导师 刘婷,湘潭大学法学院非洲法硕士生(湘潭411105)
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献17

  • 1吴慧.论《联合国海洋法公约》中强制解决争端程序的强制特性[J].法商研究,1995,13(1):55-60. 被引量:12
  • 2何艳梅.从基本概念的演变看现代国际水法的特点[J].法治论丛(上海大学法学院上海市政法管理干部学院学报),2004,19(5):94-97. 被引量:8
  • 3李铮.解决国际淡水资源争端的条法化综述[J].国际资料信息,2002(10):12-15. 被引量:10
  • 4沈允武.尼罗河流域地表水资源及其开发利用.世界地理集刊(第七集)[M].北京:商务书馆,1984.12-19.
  • 5[英]劳特派特.奥本海国际法:上卷第2分册[M].北京:商务印书馆,1972.
  • 6AaronT. Wolf. Criteria for equitable allocations : the heart of international water conflict [ J ]. Natural Resource Forum, 1999(23).
  • 7[1]Aaron T. Wolf. Criteria for equitable allocations: the heart of international water conflict [J]. Natural Resources Forum, 1999(23) :8.
  • 8[2]Maurizio Arcari. The draft article on the law of international watercourses adopted by the International Law Commission: an overview and some remarks on selected issues[J]. Natural Resources Journal, 1997, 21(3): 169 ~ 179.
  • 9[4]Stephen C. Mccaffrey. The harmon doctrine on hundred years later: buried, not praised[J]. Natural Resources Journal, 1996,36(4): 965 ~ 1007.
  • 10[5]The International Law Commission. Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1994, Volume Ⅱ part two, Report of the Commission to the General Assembly on the work of its forty-sixth session[R]. New York, United Nations, 1994 . 171.

共引文献30

同被引文献377

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部