知识型竞争性联盟知识交易机制与边界动态性——Crolles2联盟的案例研究被引量：5

Inter-firm Knowledge Transaction Mechanisms and Boundary Dynamics of Knowledge-intensive Competitive Alliance——A Case Study on Crolles2 Alliance

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要知识型竞争性联盟的主要动机是获取合作伙伴有价值的知识资源并将其应用进而创造共同收益或私有收益.本文探讨了竞争性联盟的知识交易活动;界定竞合指数以表示竞争性联盟的竞合程度及联盟边界的动态性,构建竞争性联盟收益结构和成本结构函数,剖析竞合指数、共有收益、私有收益、吸收能力、激励成本和认知成本等变量对知识交易和边界效率的影响机理;分析了Crolles2联盟的动态演化及其内在机理,印证相关研究结论;结合这些理论与案例研究,提出知识型企业对竞争性联盟知识交易活动、联盟边界和合作效应进行动态管理的相关机制. The main incentive of the knowledge-intensive competitive alliance is to acquire and use the partner＇s knowledge for creating common or private benefit. First, it discusses the knowledge transaction activities in the competitive alliance. Then, it defines the coopetition index which figures the scope of alliance and its boundary dynamics, constructs the functions of alliance benefit and cost, and studies how the factors, such as coopetition index, common and private benefit, incentive and cognitive cost, influence knowledge transaction and boundary effectiveness. Meanwhile, it analyzes in depth the dynamic evolution and internal mechanism of Crolles2 alliance. Finally, it provides the related mechanisms for knowledge-intensive enterprises to dynamically manage knowledge transactions, alliance boundary, and cooperation effect of competitive alliance .

作者江积海龙勇

机构地区重庆大学经济与工商管理学院

出处《研究与发展管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期65-74,共10页 R&D Management

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目"竞争性战略联盟的合作效应与效率边界研究"(70672012) 国家社会科学基金资助项目"后发企业知识传导的路径成本及其机制研究"(07CTQ007) 中国博士后基金资助项目(20070420121)

关键词竞争性联盟知识交易知识型企业交易机制 Crolles2联盟 competitive alliance knowledge transaction knowledge-intensive enterprise transaction mechanism Crolles2 alliance

分类号 F271 [经济管理—企业管理]

作者简介江积海（1975-），男，博士，副教授，重庆大学在站博士后，研究方向为战略管理和创新管理．

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献20

1Dussauge P, Garrette B, Mitchell W. Learning from competing partners: Outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia[ J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(2) :99-126.
2Hamel G, Prahalad C K. Competing for the future [ M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press,1994.
3Bengtsson M, Kock S. "Coopetition" in business networks - To cooperate and compete simuhaneously [ J ]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2000,29 ( 5 ) :411--426.
4Zineldin M. Co-opetition : The organisation of the future [ J ]. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 2004,22 ( 6/ 7) :780-789.
5江旭,高山行,廖貅武.外部知识获取、新产品开发与企业绩效关系的实证研究[J].研究与发展管理,2008,20(5):72-77. 被引量：28
6焦俊,李垣.基于联盟网络的企业知识获得和技术创新[J].研究与发展管理,2008,20(1):104-109. 被引量：15
7龙勇,李忠云,张宗益.技能型战略联盟基于信任的知识获取和合作效应实证研究[J].研究与发展管理,2006,18(5):36-43. 被引量：18
8Khanna T, Gulati R, Nohria N. The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998,19 ( 3 ) : 193 -210.
9Grant R M, Baden-Fuller C. A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances [ J ]. Journal of Management Studies ,2004,41 ( 1 ) :61-84.
10Anand B N, Khanna T. Do firms learn to create value : The case of alliances [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal ,2000,21 ( 3 ) :295-315.

二级参考文献79

1董广茂,李垣.战略联盟、价值网络中关系形成的效用组合分析[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(3):54-59. 被引量：18
2温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274. 被引量：3325
3Grant R M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996,17: 109-122.
4Baum J A C, Ingrain P L. Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry,1898-1980 [J]. Management Science, 1998,44:996-1016.
5Davenport T H. Knowledge management and the broader firm: Strategy, advantage, and performance [A]. In Liebowitz J (ed). Knowledge management handbook [ M]. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press,1999.
6Lee H, Choi B. Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination [ J ]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2003,20 ( 1 ) : 179-228.
7Ahn J, Chang S. Assessing the contribution of knowledge to business performance : The KP3 methodology. [J]. Decision Support Systems ,2004,36:403-416.
8Holsapple C W, Singh M. The knowledge chain model: Activities for competitiveness [ J]. Expert Systems with Applications ,2001,20( 1 ) :77-98.
9Lane P J, Lubatkin M. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998,19:461-477.
10Kogut B, Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology [ J ]. Organization Science, 1992,3 (2) : 383-397.