摘要
裁判的可接受性是指裁判具有被受众容纳而不被拒绝的属性。裁判的受众可以分为当事人、法律共同体和社会大众三种类型。理想的状态是三类受众都可接受,但在不能被同时满足的情况下,应当将法律共同体作为评判可接受性的核心受众。在评判的标准上,理想的状态是裁判结果正确,且程序公正。但在结果未知的现实裁判中,所谓"结果正确"是裁判者自信结果正确,同时使裁判受众相信结果正确。裁判文书是裁判者展示心证形成的主要载体和平台,故裁判可接受性标准的确立主要应通过裁判文书的论证和评判来实现。裁判可接受性的现实标准可以通过逻辑、法律、事实和程序四个方面具体设定。
Acceptability of Verdicts mean that verdicts can be accepted by their audiences.The audiences of verdicts consist of three types:the lawsuit parties,the legal professional community,and the public.The ideal situation is that the verdicts are accepted by all the three audiences,if not,the legal professional community should be the main audience to balance the acceptability of verdicts.The ideal evaluation criterion to the acceptability of verdicts is the outcome fairness and procedural fairness.But in a realistic ongoing judgment with an unknown outcome,'outcome fairness' means that the judge believes the outcome would be fair,and convinces the audiences of his conclusion.The written sentence is the carrier revealed discretion by the judge,so the evaluation criterion of acceptability of verdicts can be established by demonstrating the written judgment.The realistic criterion of acceptability of verdicts can be set from four respects:logic,law,fact,and procedure.
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第8期56-62,共7页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
关键词
裁判
可接受性
裁判受众
标准
Verdicts,Acceptability,Audiences of Verdicts,Criterion
作者简介
作者张雪纯，南开大学社会心理学博士后研究人员，法学博士，中国法制出版社总编辑助理，编辑一部主任。（北京100031）
