期刊文献+

微博侵权行为的法律分析 被引量:21

Legal Analysis on the Violation of Rights in MicroBlog
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 微博作为一种新兴的交流工具,走进普通民众的生活,使得公民的言论自由权利得到了更加极致的发挥。与博客相比,微博的即时通讯功能更显强大,有网络的时候可以直接书写,在没有网络的地方,只要有手机就可以随时更新内容,用户可以即时迅速地表达自己的想法、心愿。在生活节奏变的愈来愈快的今天,微博使朋友之间的沟通与交流更加方便,也为人们提供了一个自由的精神家园。但是,由于微博的操作简单性、开放性、匿名性等特点,再加上我国目前互联网方面的法律体系比较薄弱,微博用户利用微博侵害他人权益的现象不断发生,为了保护公民的合法权益不受侵犯,本文针对微博中出现的侵权行为所涉及的法律问题进行了分析,并提出一些的建议。 As a newly-emerged communication tool MicroBlog has stepped into the life of ordinary people and gives a full play to the civil rights of freedom of speech.Compared with Blog,MicroBlog is more powerful in immediate communication. As long as the Internet is available,people can make a direct and immediate updating,or can use cell phones instead,where there is no access to the Internet.Users can express their thoughts,wishes at a real time.MicroBlog makes it more convenient to communicate with friends in a more and more fast-paced society,and also provides a free spiritual homeland for people.However,since MicroBlog has features such as simplicity,openness and anonymity,what's more,the legal system in our country with regard to the Internet is relatively weak at present.There are always the cases that MicroBlog users use MicroBlog to violence others' rights.To protect the legal rights and interests of citizens,the essay analyses the legal issues concerning the violation of rights in MicroBlog,and offers some suggestions.
作者 裴心雅
机构地区 北京外国语大学
出处 《行政与法》 2010年第7期88-90,共3页 Administration and Law
关键词 微博 微博侵权 法律规制 microBlog microblogging infringement legal regulation
作者简介 裴心雅(1989-),女,吉林长春人,北京外国语大学英语学院国际新闻与传播专业。
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献15

  • 1朱萍.虚拟空间管辖权的确定——美国和欧盟实践的启示[J].法商研究,2002,19(4):19-26. 被引量:10
  • 2郭玉军,向在胜.《美国网络案件管辖权研究》,载李双元主编.《国际法与比较法论丛》第三辑,北京:中国方正出版社,2002年,第514页.
  • 3National Football League v.TVRadioNow Corp.,53 U.S.P.Q.2d 1831,2000 WL 255989(W.D.Pa.2000).
  • 4Inset Systems,Inc.v.Instruction Set Inc.,937F.Supp.161(D.Conn.1996).
  • 5Committee on the Cyberspace Law,Achieving Legal and Business order in Cyberspace,Business Lawyer,2000,v55.4,p.1850.
  • 6Mcdonough v.Fallon Mcelligott Inc.,40 U.S.P.Q.2d 1826 (S.D.Cal.1996).
  • 7Bensusan Restaurant Corp.v.King,937F.Supp.295(S.D.N.Y.1996),aff'd 126F,3d 25 (2d Cir.1997).
  • 8CompuServe,Inc.v.Patterson,89 F.3d 1257 (6th Cir,1996).
  • 9Mark A.Lemley,Software and Internet Law,Aspen Law & Business 2000.
  • 10Panavision Int' l,L.P.v.Toppenl.,938F,Supp.616(C.D.Cal.1996).

共引文献28

同被引文献135

引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部