期刊文献+

浅议涉外网络名誉侵权案件的管辖权问题 被引量:1

On the jurisdictional issues of foreign network defamation cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 涉外网络名誉侵权行为的实施地不易确定,损害结果地为数众多,传统民事管辖权的规则面临挑战,目前国际上在理论和司法实践中存在着不同的观点和做法。我国立法也没有明确的规定。针对网络名誉侵权行为的特点,网络名誉侵权案件应由侵权行为地法院或被告住所地法院管辖,侵权行为地包括实施被诉侵权行为的网络服务器、计算机终端等设备所在地和受害人受损害的结果地,损害结果地是指诽谤言论的传播地,同时又是原告的住所地或居所地或工商营业所所在地或法人的营业地,如果侵权行为地和损害结果地不一致,由原告选择管辖法院。 The implementation place of foreign network defamation activity is not easy to be determined,and the place of consequence of this damage can be various;this is why traditional civil jurisdiction rules face challenges,and there are divergent views on the theory and judicial practice globally.In view of the characteristics of network reputation infringement,Internet defamation cases should be handled by the infringement court or the domicile jurisdiction court of the defendant.Infringement locations include equipment locations like network servers,computer terminals as well as the place of consequence where the victim is afflicted with the tort damage.Location of damage refers to the place of dissemination of defamatory statements,or the plaintiff's domicile,or the business location,or the legal persons' place of business.If the infringement location and damage result location are inconsistent,the the jurisdiction of the court can be selected by the plaintiff.
作者 戴琼
出处 《政法学刊》 2012年第4期49-53,共5页 Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词 网络名誉侵权 国际民事管辖权 侵权行为地 损害结果地 network reputation infringement international civil jurisdiction place of tort place of damage
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1王德全.试论Internet案件的司法管辖权[J].中外法学,1998,10(2):25-31. 被引量:78
  • 2朱萍.虚拟空间管辖权的确定——美国和欧盟实践的启示[J].法商研究,2002,19(4):19-26. 被引量:10
  • 3See Cubby Inc v. Compu Server Inc. 776F. Supp. 135 S.D.N.Y. ( 1991 ).
  • 4See Great American Court Cases, Volum I Individual Liberties, Merk Mikula and L. MphloMabunda, o. 433.
  • 5See (1937)I All ER 725 Kroch v. Rossell et Cie.
  • 6See Bachchan v. India Abroad Publications Inc 20 Med L Rep(BMA) 1051 (NY Sup CT 1992).
  • 7Blacks Law Dictionary, West Publishing. Co. 1979, pp. 1171 - 1172.
  • 8See Handelskwekerij GJ Bier BV v. Miners de Pota.s.se d Alsace SA (case 21/76) (1976) ECR 1735, 1749: (1978) QB708,703.
  • 9See Peter Mankowski, Internet im internationalen Vertrags- und Deliktsrecht, Rabel Zeitschrift, 1999(63), Seite 258.Seite 287 - 288.
  • 10See Raymond A. Kurz, Internet and the Law, Govermment Institutes, Inc. Rockville, Maryland 1997,pp. 122 - 123.

共引文献44

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部