期刊文献+

肠内营养对重症急性胰腺炎患者小肠细菌过度生长抑制作用的临床评估 被引量:4

Clinical Evaluation on Inhibition of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth by Enteral Nutrition in Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:急性胰腺炎(AP)动物模型存在小肠细菌过度生长(SIBO),肠内营养(EN)可降低重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)患者胰腺继发感染的风险.目的:评估EN对SAP患者SIBO的影响.方法:13例CT严重度指数(CTSI)≥3分的AP患者随机分为EN组(7例)和胃肠外营养(PN)组(6例),所有患者均置入鼻空肠管,分别于第1 d、3 d、7 d行葡萄糖氢呼气试验(GHBT),计算患者每次GHBT的总产氢量.EN组患者于首次GHBT后即开始行EN,PN组患者于第二次GHBT后改行EN.结果:两组患者首次GHBT的总产氢量差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),EN组第一、二次GHBT总产氢量下降值显著大于PN组(33.0对4.0,P〈0.05);两组间第一、三次GHBT总产氢量下降值相当,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05).结论:EN可能对SAP患者的SIBO有抑制作用. Background: Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) occurs in animal models of acute pancreatitis (AP), and enteral nutrition (EN) can reduce the risk of secondary infection in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) patients. Aims: To evaluate the effect of EN on SIBO in SAP patients. Methods: Thirteen AP patients with CT severity index (CTSI) I〉 3 were randomly allocated into EN group (7 cases) and parenteral nutrition (PN) group (6 cases). Naso-jejunum tube was placed in all the patients. Glucose hydrogen breath test (GHBT) was performed on 1st, 3rd and 7th day, respectively and total hydrogen production was calculated. Patients in EN group received EN after 1st GHBT, while patients in PN group started EN after 2nd GHBT. Results: There was no significant difference in total hydrogen production of 1st GHBT between the two groups (P〉0.05). The decrease of total hydrogen production from 1st to 2nd GHBT in EN group was significantly higher than that in PN group (33.0 vs. 4.0, P〈0.05). However, there was no significant difference of the decrease from 1st to 3rd GHBT between the two groups (P〉0.05). Conclusions: EN might inhibit SIBO in SAP patients.
出处 《胃肠病学》 2010年第4期222-224,共3页 Chinese Journal of Gastroenterology
基金 上海市卫生局基金项目(No.2006031) 上海市重点学科建设项目(No.Y0205)资助
关键词 胰腺炎 CT严重度指数 肠道营养 胃肠外营养 氢呼气试验 小肠细菌过度生长 Pancreatitis CT Severity Index Enteral Nutrition Parenteral Nutrition Hydrogen Breath Test Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth
作者简介 本文通讯作者,Emaihwushuming@vip.sina.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Whitcomb DC.Clinical practice.Acute pancreatitis.N Engl J Med,2006,354 (20):2142-2150.
  • 2Van Felius ID,Akkermans LM,Bosscha K,et al.Interdigestive small bowel motility and duodenal bacterial overgrowth in experimental acute pancreatitis.Neurogastroenterol Motil,2003,15 (3):267-276.
  • 3Petrov MS,van Santvoort HC,Besselink MG,et al.Enteral nutrition and the risk of mortality and infectious complications in patients with severe acute pancreatitis:a reta-analysis of randomized trials.Arch Surg,2008,143 (11):1111-1117.
  • 4Balthazar EJ,Freeny PC,vanSonnenberg E.Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis.Radiology,1994,193 (2):297-306.
  • 5Gerzof SG,Banks PA,Robbins AH,et al.Early diagnosis of pancreatic infection by computed tomography-gnided aspiration.Gastroenterology,1987,93 (6):1315-1320.
  • 6Beget HG,Rau B,Mayer J,et al.Natural course of acute pancreatitis.World J Stag,1997,21 (2):130-135.
  • 7Tsui NC,Zhao E,Li Z,et al.Microbiological findings in secondary infection of severe acute pancreatitis:a retrospective clinical study.Pancreas,2009,38 (5):499-502.
  • 8Dervenis C,Smailis D,Hatzitheoklitos E.Bacterial translocation and its prevention in acute pancreatitis.J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg,2003,10 (6):415-418.
  • 9Lankisch PG,Warnecke B,Bruns D,et al.The APACHE Ⅱ score is unreliable to diagnose necrotizing pancreatitis on admission to hospital.Pancreas,2002,24 (3):217-222.
  • 10De Bernardinis M,Violi V,Roncoroni L,et al.Discriminant power and information content of Ranson's prognostic signs in acute pancreatitis:a meta-analytic study.Crit Care Med,1999,27 (10):2272-2283.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester PA, et al. Early enteral feeding versus "nil by mouth" after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BMJ, 2001,323:773-776.
  • 2Vu MK, van der Veek PP, Frolich M, et al. Does jejunal feeding activate exocrine pancreatic secretion? Eur J Clin Invest, 1999,29:1053-1059.
  • 3Marik PE, Pinsky M. Death by parenteral nutrition. Intensive Care Med, 2003,29:867-869.
  • 4McClave SA, Greene LM, Snider HL, et al. Comparison of the safety of early enteral vs parenteral nutrition in mild acute pancreatitis. J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 1997,21: 14-20.
  • 5Kalfarentzos F, Kehagias J, Mead N,et al. Enteral nutrition is superior to parenteral nutrition in severe acute pancreatitis:results of a randomized prospective trial. Br J Surg, 1997,84:1665-1669.
  • 6Windsor AC, Kanwar S, Li AG, et al. Compared with parenteral nutrition, enteral feeding attenuates the acute phase response and improves disease severity in acute pancreatitis.Gut, 1998,42:431-435.
  • 7Abou-Assi S, Craig K, OKeefe SJ. Hypocaloric jejunal feeding is better than total parenteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis:results of a randomized comparative study. Am J Gastroenterol,2002,97: 2255-2262.
  • 8Olah A, Pardavi G, Belagyi T, et al. Early nasojejunal feeding in acute pancreatitis is associated with a lower complication rate. Nutrition, 2002,18:259-262.
  • 9Gupta R, Patel K, Calder PC, et al. A randomised clinical trial to assess the effect of total enteral and total parenteral nutritional support on metabolic, inflammatory and oxidative markers in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis (APACHE Ⅱ> or = 6). Pancreatology, 2003,3: 406-413.
  • 10Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials, 1996,17:1-12.

共引文献44

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部