企业规模与创新绩效关系的实证研究——基于中国光电子产业的分析被引量：14

An Empirical Research on the Relationship between Enterprise Size and Innovative Performance of Enterprise——Based on Photoelectron Industry in China

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要以我国光电子企业为样本,选择专利申请数、新产品销售比例和产品新颖程度三个指标测度企业的创新绩效,实证分析了企业规模与创新绩效之间的关系。结果表明,就光电子产业中的企业规模与创新绩效的关系而言,既不能简单地说大企业比小企业更创新,也不能说小企业比大企业更创新,二者之间的关系根据创新绩效衡量指标的不同而呈现出不同状态。研究结果既显示了分产业研究企业规模与创新绩效关系的意义,同时也证实了采用多指标并分别进行创新绩效测度的必要性。 Taking China＇s ph of innovative product and the otoelectron enterprises as samples, the number of patents applied, the sale percentage degree of novelty of product are chosen as the indexes to measure innovative performance, and the impacts of enterprise size on innovative performance are examined. The statistical results indicate that, as far as the relationship between enterprise size and innovative performance in the photoelectron industry is concerned, their relationship is different as the measurement index of innovative performance is different. So we cannot simply say that large enterprises are more innovative than small enterprises or small enterprises are more innovative than large enterprises. The findings still provide support for the necessity of not only studying the relationship between enterprise size and innovative performance according to per industry, but also measuring innovative performance through multi -indexes respectively.

作者刘锦英

机构地区河南大学管理科学与工程研究所

出处《软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第4期20-23,共4页 Soft Science

关键词企业规模创新绩效创新测度光电子产业 enterprise size innovative performance innovation measurement photoelectron industry

分类号 F270.7 [经济管理—企业管理]

作者简介作者简介：刘锦英（1973-），女，河南唐河人，管理学博士，河南大学管理科学与工程研究所副教授，研究方向为技术创新、产业集群。

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献20

1Schumpeter J A.Capitalism,Socialism and Democracy[M].Harper & Row,New York,1942.
2Zhao H,Tong X,Wong P K,Zhu J.Types of Technology Sourcing and Innovative Capability:An Exploratory Study of Singapore Manufacturing Firms[J].Journal of High Technology Management Research,2005(16):209-224.
3Kam W P,Kiese M,Singh A,Wong F.The Pattern of Innovation in Singapore's Manufacturing Sector[J].Singapore ManagementReview,2003,25(1):1-34.
4Cohen W M,Klepper S.A Reprise on Size and R&D[J].Economic Journal,1996,106(437):925 -951.
5Kumar N,Saqib M.Firm Size,Opportunities for Adaptation and In-house R&D Activity in Developing Countries:The Case of Indian Manufacturing[J].Research Policy,1996(25):713-722.
6Acs Z,Audretsch D.Innovation,Market Structure and Firm Size[J].The Review of Economics and Statistics,1987,71:567 -574.
7Veugelers R,Cassiman B.Make and Buy in Innovation Strategies:Evidence from Belgian Manufacturing Firms[J].Research Policy,1999,28:63-80.
8Stock G N,Greis N P,Fischer W A.Firm Size and Dynamic Technological Innovation[J].Technovation,2002(22):537-549.
9Beneito P.Choosing Among Alternative Technological Strategies:An Empirical Analysis of Formal Sources of Innovation[J].Research Policy,2003(32):693-713.
10Negassi S.R&D Co -operation and Innovation a Microeconometric Study on French Firms[J].Research Policy,2004(33):365 -384.