期刊文献+

学优生和学困生父母教养方式、自我概念的对比研究 被引量:4

The Study on Relationship Between Self-concept and Parental Rearing Patterns of Achievers and Underachievers
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较研究学优生和学困生父母教养方式、自我概念的差异及其及其父母教养方式、自我概念的关系。方法:运用自我描述问卷(SDQ-II)和父母教养方式问卷(EMBU)对158名初中生(学优生76名,学困生82名)进行调查。结果:(1)学优生较之学困生,父母更多的采用积极的教养方式,给予更多的情感温暖、理解,较少运用拒绝否认和惩罚严厉等消极的教养方式;(2)在自我概念各因子上,学优生与学困生存在显著差异(除言语、外貌、体能外),具有更加积极的自我概念;(3)父母积极地教养方式与子女的自我概念呈显著正相关(p<0.001),而消极的教养方式与其呈显著负相关(p<0.001)。结论:(1)学优生和学困生在父母教养方式、自我概念上存在显著差异;(2)父母教养方式与自我概念密切相关。 Objective:To compare the difference between Self-concept and Parental Rearing Patterns of achievers and underachievers and the relationship between Self-concept and Parental Rearing Patterns ;Method:158 middle school students including 76 achievers and 82 underachievers were assessed with SDQII (self description scale-II) and EMBU;Result:Compared to underachievers,the parents of achievers turn to more positive rearing pattern,giving their children more emotional warm and understanding,and used fewer negative rearing patterns such as refusal,rejection and pubnistment ;The significant difference between achievers and underachievers in every factor of Self-Concept besides the factor of language,appearance and physical constitution,was that the achievers had more positive Self-Concept ;Self-Concept of students was significantly correlated with the positive parenting style (p〈0.001),but significantly negatively correlated with the negative parenting style.Conclusion:First,There was a significant difference between Self-concept and Parental Rearing Patterns of achievers and underachievers ;Second,Self-concept of middle school students is closely correlated with parental rearing patterns.
出处 《科技信息》 2009年第31期175-177,共3页 Science & Technology Information
关键词 学优生 学困生 父母教养方式 自我概念 Achiever underachiever Parental rearing patterns Self-concept
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献113

共引文献1034

同被引文献38

  • 1李晓东,张向葵,沃建中.小学三年级数学学优生与学困生解决比较问题的差异[J].心理学报,2002,34(4):400-406. 被引量:33
  • 2陈英和,仲宁宁,田国胜,王治国.小学2~4年级儿童数学应用题表征策略差异的研究[J].心理发展与教育,2004,20(4):19-24. 被引量:29
  • 3岳冬梅,李鸣杲,金魁和,丁宝坤.父母教养方式:EMBU 的初步修订及其在神经症患者的应用[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1993,7(3):97-101. 被引量:705
  • 4王翠萍,张大均.数学教学中培养学生学习自我效能感的实验研究[J].心理发展与教育,2007,23(3):62-67. 被引量:22
  • 5Diezmann C M, Watters J J. Summing up the education of mathematically gifted students. In: Barton B, Irwin K C, Pfannkuch M, et al. (Eds.). Mathematics Edu- cation in the South Pacific. Sydney: MERGA, 2002. 219 - 226.
  • 6Bull R, Johnston R S. Children's arithmetical difficul- ties: Contributions from processing speed, item identifi- cation, and short - term memory. Journal of Experi- mental Child Psychology, 1997, 65 (1) : 1 - 24.
  • 7Geary D C, Brown S C. Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed of processing differences in gifted, normal, and mathematically disabled children. Devel- opmental Psychology, 1991, 27(3) : 398 - 406.
  • 8Steiner H H, Cart M. Cognitive development in gifted children: Toward a more precise understanding of emerging differences in intelligence. Educational Psy- chology Review, 2003, 15(3) : 215 - 246.
  • 9Raghubar K P, Barnes M A, Hecht S A. Working memory and mathematics: A review of developmental, individual difference, and cognitive approaches. I_earn- ing and Individual Differences, 2010, 20: 110- 122.
  • 10Alloway T P. How does working memory work in the classroom? Educational Research and Reviews, 2006, 1 (4) : 134 - 139.

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部