摘要
目的:比较经腹腔镜与经腹根治性子宫切除治疗早期宫颈癌的临床。方法:回顾性分析2007年3月～2009年3月早期宫颈癌根治术152例,其中经腹腔镜手术55例(腹腔镜组),经腹手术97例(经腹组),比较2种术式在手术时间、术中出血量、手术并发症等方面的差异。结果:腹腔镜组与经腹组在手术时间、术中出血及术后肠道功能恢复方面差异具有统计学意义(P均<0.05),在淋巴结切除个数及术后并发症方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:经腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术术中出血较少,术后肠道功能恢复较快,但手术时间相对较长。
Objective： To compare laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for the treatment of ear- ly cervical cancer. Methods： A retrospective study on 152 cases early cervical cancer of radical surgery from March 2007-March 2009, in which 55 cases were treated by laparoscopic surgery, 97 cases were treated transabdominal surgery. Operation time, bleeding volume, and surgical complications were compared in the two groups. Results： There was a statistical significance on operation time, blood loss and postoperative recovery of intestinal function between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and transabdominal radical hys- terectomy, and no significant difference on number of lymphnode dissection and postoperative complica- tions. Conclusion： Laparoscopic surgery has significant advantages on the blood loss, postoperative recovery of intestinal function but a relatively long operation time.
出处
《新疆医科大学学报》
CAS
2009年第10期1407-1409,共3页
Journal of Xinjiang Medical University
关键词
早期宫颈癌
腹腔镜
宫颈癌根治术
early cervical cancer
laparoscopy
radical hysterectomy
作者简介
作者简介：周萍（1977-），女，住院医师，在职研究生，研究方向：妇科肿瘤。
通讯作者：程静新，女，主任医师，硕士生导师，研究方向：妇科肿瘤，Email：cjx6611@139．com。
